Back

Male mice heterozygous for Protamine-1 and Protamine-2 are infertile displaying sperm damage and retention of Protamine-2 precursors, transition proteins and histones.

Merges, G. E.; Wiesejahn, C.; Domingo-Lopez, M.; Schneider, S.; Kovacevic, A.; Arevalo, L.; Schorle, H.

2026-03-16 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.03.15.711850 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDDuring spermiogenesis, histones are exchanged by protamines (PRMs) in spermatids, which results in DNA hypercondensation and protection. Rodents and primates express two PRMs (PRM1 and PRM2) in a species-specific ratio. Maintaining this ratio is necessary for functional chromatin reorganization and alteration is associated with sub- or infertility in mice and humans. Prm1 and Prm2 deficient mice are infertile, while Prm1+/- males are subfertile showing a severely altered PRM ratio. Prm2+/- males are fertile and display a protamine ratio comparable to WT. OBJECTIVESHere, we addressed the question whether loss of one allele of Prm1 and one allele of Prm2 affects fertility. MATERIAL AND METHODSDouble heterozygous (dHET) mice lacking one allele of Prm1 and one allele of Prm2 were generated and analyzed RESULTSdHET males were infertile with sperm showing retention of histones and TNPs, high levels of PRM2 precursor and decreased levels of mature PRM2. In mature sperm the PRM ratio and the total PRM content was not altered. However, CMA3 staining revealed incomplete protamination and sperm nuclei appeared more rounded and slightly bigger, suggesting impaired DNA-hypercondensation. In dHET sperm, DNA degradation was apparent, but to a lower level compared to sperm from Prm1 and Prm2 deficient males. Increased 8-OHdG levels suggested oxidative stress in the epididymis of dHET mice. However, a fraction of dHET sperm were capable of fertilization, with embryonic development up to 8-cell stage. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONThese results suggest, that male factor infertility might not be reliably detected by measuring PRM1/PRM2 ratio but rather by determining the level of protamination by e.g. CMA3 analysis and pre-PRM2 retention.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Molecular Human Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Biology of Reproduction
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
9
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
12
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Developmental Dynamics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
19
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%