Back

Disruption of RBM20 causes atrial electrophysiological disturbances

Weirauch, L.; Wiedmann, F.; Schraft, L.; van den Hoogenhof, M. M. G.; Prueser, M.; Kraft, M.; Wang, Y.; Paasche, A.; Dobreva, G.; Steinmetz, L.; Schmidt, C.

2026-03-17 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.14.711772 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of heart failure, with 30-50 % of cases attributed to familial inheritance. Mutations in RNA-binding motif protein 20 (RBM20) account for 3-5 % of cases and are associated with severe DCM and ventricular arrhythmias. However, the role of RBM20 mutations in atrial cardiomyopathy (AtCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) remains underexplored. This study investigates the effects of the RBM20-R636Q mutation on atrial electrophysiology and evaluates sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) inhibitors as potential therapeutics. ResultsRbm20-R636Q mice exhibited atrial remodeling, including hypertrophy, left atrial enlargement, and shortened action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90). Compared with RBM20-knockout and laminopathy models, RBM20-R636Q mice showed distinct reductions in Ito / IKur without changes in IK,sus or IK,tail currents, alongside TASK-1 potassium current upregulation and alterations of ICaL. SGLT inhibitors (sotagliflozin, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) reduced AP inducibility and partially restored APD90, with effects comparable to lidocaine, suggesting a role in modulating peak sodium currents. ConclusionsRBM20 mutations contribute to atrial remodeling, promoting AtCM and AF. SGLT inhibitors demonstrate therapeutic potential by modulating atrial electrophysiology and reducing arrhythmogenesis, offering a promising strategy for managing RBM20-related cardiac disorders. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=156 SRC="FIGDIR/small/711772v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (46K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bf3b44org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc2ee1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19e8f6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10da900_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.9%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
11
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
15
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
16
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%