Back

3D-Manhattan: An interactive visualization tool for multiple GWAS results

Hashimoto, S.

2026-03-17 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.14.709978 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used to identify genetic loci underlying various agronomic traits. Conventional Manhattan plots provide an effective two-dimensional (2D) summary of an individual GWAS result. However, recent advances in high-throughput phenotyping have led to study designs that generate multiple GWAS outputs across time points, traits, or experimental conditions. In such settings, biological insight increasingly depends on comparative interpretation of multiple association maps, yet panel-based arrangements of 2D plots fragment related information and impede recognition of shared or dynamic genetic signals. Here, I present 3D-Manhattan, an interactive visualization framework that integrates multiple GWAS results within a unified three-dimensional (3D) coordinate system. By extending the conventional Manhattan plot with an additional axis representing time, trait, or condition, 3D-Manhattan enables simultaneous, axis-aligned comparison of association landscapes while preserving genomic coordinates and statistical values. The tool is implemented as a stand-alone, browser-based application using WebGL-based rendering and supports smooth interaction without server-side computation. The framework provides flexible visualization controls, region highlighting, and variant-level correspondence across datasets, facilitating exploratory analysis of stable and context-dependent genetic associations. Collectively, 3D-Manhattan provides an alternative approach for visualizing multi-dimensional GWAS results and offers a powerful platform for visualizing general a series of genome-wide datasets.

Published in Breeding Science · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.