Back

Comparative effectiveness of three linezolid management strategies for peripheral neuropathy during multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment

Romo, M. L.; LaHood, A.; Mitnick, C. D.; Rich, M. L.; Trevisi, L.; Skrahina, A.; Oyewusi, L.; Bastard, M.; Khan, P. Y.; Huerga, H.; Khan, U.; Herrera Flores, E.; Atshemyan, H.; Hewison, C.; Rashitov, M.; Samieva, N.; Gomez-Restrepo, C.; Krisnanda, A.; Kotrikadze, T.; Siraj, F.; Khan, A. W.; Ndjeka, N.; Adenov, M.; Seung, K.; Kumsa, A.; Franke, M. F.

2026-03-16 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.14.26348377 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPeripheral neuropathy frequently leads to linezolid dose reductions or interruptions during multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment. The effect of these modifications to linezolid on treatment success is uncertain. MethodsWe conducted a target trial emulation using the endTB Observational Study among individuals who developed mild or moderate peripheral neuropathy while receiving linezolid 600 mg daily within 6 months of initiating an individualized regimen. We examined three linezolid management strategies: immediate change (suspension or dose reduction) during Weeks 1-7, deferred change during Weeks 8-26, and no change (i.e., continuing linezolid 600 mg daily) during Weeks 1-26. We used a clone-censor-weight approach to estimate the observational analog of the per-protocol effect on treatment success. ResultsAmong 303 eligible participants from 12 countries, peripheral neuropathy occurred a median (interquartile range) of 11 (4-18) weeks after treatment initiation. Weighted, standardized probabilities of treatment success were 85.8% (95% CI: 72.7%, 93.9%) for immediate change, 78.8% (95% CI: 66.1%, 87.1%) for deferred change, and 85.2% (95% CI: 80.5%, 89.1%) for no change. Compared with no change, treatment success ratios were 1.01 for immediate change (95% CI: 0.86, 1.11) and 0.93 for deferred change (95% CI: 0.78, 1.01) strategies. ConclusionsWe did not find evidence of a substantial negative impact of immediate modification to linezolid among people who developed mild or moderate peripheral neuropathy in the first six months of an individualized regimen. Our results support the clinical practice of cautiously adjusting linezolid when needed to manage non-severe peripheral neuropathy. Key pointsIn this target trial emulation, we found that immediate modifications to linezolid (dose reduction or suspension) in response to mild or moderate peripheral neuropathy during the first six months of MDR/RR-TB treatment did not substantially compromise MDR/RR-TB treatment success.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
5
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
14
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
16
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
18
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
19
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
21
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%