Comparative effectiveness of three linezolid management strategies for peripheral neuropathy during multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment
Romo, M. L.; LaHood, A.; Mitnick, C. D.; Rich, M. L.; Trevisi, L.; Skrahina, A.; Oyewusi, L.; Bastard, M.; Khan, P. Y.; Huerga, H.; Khan, U.; Herrera Flores, E.; Atshemyan, H.; Hewison, C.; Rashitov, M.; Samieva, N.; Gomez-Restrepo, C.; Krisnanda, A.; Kotrikadze, T.; Siraj, F.; Khan, A. W.; Ndjeka, N.; Adenov, M.; Seung, K.; Kumsa, A.; Franke, M. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundPeripheral neuropathy frequently leads to linezolid dose reductions or interruptions during multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment. The effect of these modifications to linezolid on treatment success is uncertain. MethodsWe conducted a target trial emulation using the endTB Observational Study among individuals who developed mild or moderate peripheral neuropathy while receiving linezolid 600 mg daily within 6 months of initiating an individualized regimen. We examined three linezolid management strategies: immediate change (suspension or dose reduction) during Weeks 1-7, deferred change during Weeks 8-26, and no change (i.e., continuing linezolid 600 mg daily) during Weeks 1-26. We used a clone-censor-weight approach to estimate the observational analog of the per-protocol effect on treatment success. ResultsAmong 303 eligible participants from 12 countries, peripheral neuropathy occurred a median (interquartile range) of 11 (4-18) weeks after treatment initiation. Weighted, standardized probabilities of treatment success were 85.8% (95% CI: 72.7%, 93.9%) for immediate change, 78.8% (95% CI: 66.1%, 87.1%) for deferred change, and 85.2% (95% CI: 80.5%, 89.1%) for no change. Compared with no change, treatment success ratios were 1.01 for immediate change (95% CI: 0.86, 1.11) and 0.93 for deferred change (95% CI: 0.78, 1.01) strategies. ConclusionsWe did not find evidence of a substantial negative impact of immediate modification to linezolid among people who developed mild or moderate peripheral neuropathy in the first six months of an individualized regimen. Our results support the clinical practice of cautiously adjusting linezolid when needed to manage non-severe peripheral neuropathy. Key pointsIn this target trial emulation, we found that immediate modifications to linezolid (dose reduction or suspension) in response to mild or moderate peripheral neuropathy during the first six months of MDR/RR-TB treatment did not substantially compromise MDR/RR-TB treatment success.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment initiation among bacteriologically negative individuals evaluated for tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis 94%
- Barriers to engagement by people with active tuberculosis in the care cascade in India: a systematic review of two decades of quantitative research 94%
- Cost-effectiveness of screening with transcriptional signatures for incipient TB among U.S. migrants 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse events reported during weekly isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) tuberculosis preventive treatment among people living with HIV in Uganda 95%
- Programmatic diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of Xpert MTB/XDR in patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Georgia 95%
- Potential Utility of C-reactive Protein for Tuberculosis Risk Stratification among Patients with Non-Meningitic Symptoms at HIV Diagnosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Potential impact, costs, and benefits of population-wide screening interventions for tuberculosis in Viet Nam: a mathematical modelling study 93%
- Accuracy of digital chest x-ray analysis with artificial intelligence software as a triage and screening tool in hospitalized patients being evaluated for tuberculosis in Lima, Peru 92%
- The role of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in the effect of Azithromycin on Child Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the CHAT Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.