Back

Acceptability and Feasibility of Combination Treatment for Cervical Precancer Among Women Living with HIV in South Africa: Primary Outcomes from the ACT 2 Randomized Trial

Teodoro, N. S.; Mollan, K.; Keys, J. R.; Liu, C.; Mulongo, M.; Gumede, S.; Pasipamire, T.; Faesen, M.; Mischell, M. A.; Rahangdale, L.; Chibwesha, C. J.

2026-03-16 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.03.14.26348308 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveDetermine acceptability and feasibility of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) combined with adjuvant intravaginal 5-fluorouracil (5FU) for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 (CIN2/3) in women living with HIV (WLWH). DesignDouble-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2b feasibility trial. SettingPublic-sector hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Population180 WLWH aged 18+ years with CIN2/3 confirmed by LEEP and on antiretroviral therapy for [≥]60 days. MethodsParticipants underwent LEEP and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 8 doses of adjuvant 5FU or placebo cream every other week and followed for 24 weeks. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcomes were acceptability and feasibility (adherence, retention, safety, tolerability). ResultsBetween March 2023 and January 2025, we randomized 180 WLWH. Median age was 41 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-45), median CD4+ count was 636 cells/mm3 (IQR: 376-873), and 98.9% were virologically suppressed. Acceptability (>94%) and adherence (>91%) were high and comparable between arms. Retention exceeded 92% in both arms, although Week 24 attendance was lower in the 5FU arm (92.2% vs. 98.9%, probability difference [PD] -6.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -14.4%, -0.5%). Safety events were mild, more common with 5FU, and primarily reported as Grade 1 or 2 cervical inflammation (49.2% vs. 26.7%, risk difference [RD] 22.5%, 95% CI 8.6%, 36.4%). One Grade 3 adverse event (an allergic reaction to 5FU) resulted in treatment discontinuation. ConclusionsLEEP plus adjuvant intravaginal 5FU is acceptable and feasible among WLWH in South Africa, supporting progression to a Phase 3 trial. Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT05413811. FundingUnited States National Institutes of Health (R01CA250850).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%