Back

Prevalence of Monogenic Aetiologies of Kidney Stone Disease in Selected and Unselected Kidney Stone Cohorts

Lovegrove, C. E.; Croghan, S.; Geraghty, R.; Mabillard, H.; Asaad, W.; Bull, K. E.; Furniss, D.; Rogers, A.; Sayer, J. A.; Howles, S. A.

2026-03-17 urology
10.64898/2026.03.14.26348230 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectiveKidney stone disease (KSD) is common and distinct monogenic forms with well-defined treatment pathways exist. However, it is unclear which patients should undergo genetic testing and the significance of monoallelic variants in SLC34A1, SLC34A3, CYP24A1, SLC7A9, and SLC3A1. We aimed to define monogenic KSD inheritance patterns, determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in selected and unselected cohorts, and establish the utility of standard serum biochemistry in highlighting those at risk of monogenic KSD. MethodsWe compared genetic and phenotypic data from individuals with and without KSD in the UK Biobank to determine inheritance patterns. We established the "number needed to test" (NNTT) to identify monogenic KSD in the UK Biobank and a specialist adult kidney stone nephrology clinic where patients had genetic testing based on age, recurrence, and family history. We examined the utility of standard serum biochemistry in identifying monogenic KSD in both settings. Key findings and limitationsMonogenic KSD associated with SLC34A3, SLC7A9, and SLC3A1 is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner and monogenic KSD associated with SLC34A1 and CYP24A1 in an autosomal recessive manner. A monogenic diagnosis was made in [~]1% of KSD in the UK Biobank (NNTT[~]90) and 15% of KSD in a specialist nephrology clinic (NNTT[~]7). In both settings, standard serum biochemistry failed to identify individuals at risk of monogenic KSD. Conclusions and clinical implicationsGenetic testing for monogenic KSD has utility in specialist settings where there is clinical suspicion of an inherited disorder even in the absence of biochemical abnormalities.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.0%
3
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
5
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
18
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%