Back

Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics of Proliferation Heterogeneity: A Phenotype-Structured Model for Tumor Growth and Treatment Response

Schmalenstroer, L.; Rockne, R. C.; Farahpour, F.

2026-03-17 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.13.711687 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intra-tumor heterogeneity in proliferation rates fundamentally influences cancer progression and treatment resistance. To investigate how continuous phenotypic variation shapes eco-evolutionary dynamics, we develop a phenotype-structured partial differential equation framework that explicitly models proliferation het-erogeneity as a dynamic trait distribution. Our model integrates three key biological principles: (1) phenotypic diffusion capturing heritable variation in proliferation rates, (2) global resource competition enforcing density-dependent growth constraints, and (3) an experimentally grounded life-history trade-off linking elevated proliferation to increased mortality. Using adaptive dynamics, we derive the optimum proliferation rate in a growing tumor, showing that the optimal phenotype dynamically shifts toward slower proliferation as tumors approach carrying capacity. We perform in silico treatment simulations for four different treatment regimes (pan-proliferation, low-, mid-, and high-proliferation targeting) to show how therapeutic selective pressures reshape fitness landscapes. While all treatments slow down tumor growth, they induce divergent evolutionary trajectories: low- and mid-proliferation targeting enrich fast-proliferating clones, whereas high-proliferation targeting selects for slower phenotypes. We connect these dynamics with changes in mean proliferation rates during and after treatment. We use adaptive dynamics to explain the shifts in mean proliferation rate during treatment, showing how each regimen alters the maximum fitness proliferation rate. Our work establishes a predictive, evolutionarily grounded framework for understanding how therapy reshapes tumor proliferation landscapes, offering a mechanistic basis for designing strategies that anticipate and counteract adaptive resistance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
22.3%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
12.2%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
21
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
25
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%