Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics of Proliferation Heterogeneity: A Phenotype-Structured Model for Tumor Growth and Treatment Response
Schmalenstroer, L.; Rockne, R. C.; Farahpour, F.
Show abstract
Intra-tumor heterogeneity in proliferation rates fundamentally influences cancer progression and treatment resistance. To investigate how continuous phenotypic variation shapes eco-evolutionary dynamics, we develop a phenotype-structured partial differential equation framework that explicitly models proliferation het-erogeneity as a dynamic trait distribution. Our model integrates three key biological principles: (1) phenotypic diffusion capturing heritable variation in proliferation rates, (2) global resource competition enforcing density-dependent growth constraints, and (3) an experimentally grounded life-history trade-off linking elevated proliferation to increased mortality. Using adaptive dynamics, we derive the optimum proliferation rate in a growing tumor, showing that the optimal phenotype dynamically shifts toward slower proliferation as tumors approach carrying capacity. We perform in silico treatment simulations for four different treatment regimes (pan-proliferation, low-, mid-, and high-proliferation targeting) to show how therapeutic selective pressures reshape fitness landscapes. While all treatments slow down tumor growth, they induce divergent evolutionary trajectories: low- and mid-proliferation targeting enrich fast-proliferating clones, whereas high-proliferation targeting selects for slower phenotypes. We connect these dynamics with changes in mean proliferation rates during and after treatment. We use adaptive dynamics to explain the shifts in mean proliferation rate during treatment, showing how each regimen alters the maximum fitness proliferation rate. Our work establishes a predictive, evolutionarily grounded framework for understanding how therapy reshapes tumor proliferation landscapes, offering a mechanistic basis for designing strategies that anticipate and counteract adaptive resistance.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.