Older adults' beliefs about anxiety: A multicultural qualitative study informed by Leventhal's Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation
Alkholy, R.; Lovell, K.; Pedley, R.; Bee, P.
Show abstract
Aim Anxiety disorders in older adults are commonly underdiagnosed and undertreated, especially among minority ethnic groups. This UK multicultural qualitative study aimed to explore and compare beliefs about anxiety among self-reporting White British, South Asian, African and Caribbean older adults, using Leventhal's Common-Sense Model. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with 52 older adults who self-reported anxiety (current or past). Data were managed and analysed using the Framework Method. Professional interpreters facilitated interviews with non-English speakers. Findings The study incorporated the perspectives of 27 older adults with distressing anxiety and 25 with non-distressing anxiety. Participants' beliefs mapped onto the illness-related dimensions in Leventhal's Common-Sense Model. Beliefs about anxiety differed across and within cultural groups, with notable distinctions between participants with distressing and non-distressing anxiety. Those with distressing anxiety neither normalised anxiety nor considered it as an illness trajectory. Overall, participants had a fragmented understanding of anxiety disorders. Specific aspects of older adults' beliefs were influenced by their salient identities rather than their cultural background. Two new dimensions were identified: aggravating factors, believed to trigger or exacerbate anxiety symptoms; protective factors, believed to alleviate or prevent mental health problems. Conclusions Applying Leventhal's Common-Sense Model to anxiety has yielded new insights with significant implications for understanding potential causes of low mental health services use among older adults. Grouping people into broad categories of cultural groups disregards the diversity among individuals within the same group. Cross-cultural research should embrace this diversity and employ nuanced approaches to provide meaningful, person-centred insights into people's perceptions of illness.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the experiences of loneliness in adults with mental health problems: a co-produced participatory qualitative interview study 97%
- Characteristics of mental health stability during COVID-19: An online survey with people residing in the Liverpool City Region 95%
- Depressive and anxiety symptoms and COVID-19-related factors among men and women in Nigeria 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 97%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 95%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 95%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 94%
- A psychometric validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in community-dwelling older adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 95%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What has changed in the experiences of people with mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic? Findings from follow-up interviews using a coproduced, participatory qualitative approach 96%
- Loneliness and the onset of new mental health problems in the general population: a systematic review 94%
- Mental health in higher-education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.