Multimodal Machine Learning for Glaucoma Detection in a Sub-Saharan African Clinical Population
Adator, E.; Owus-Ansah, A.; Berchie, M. O.; Markwei, J.; Mannyeya, J. S.-A.; Anag-bey, K.; Boakye, A. Y.; Kyei, S.; Morny, E.; Addai, E.
Show abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the performance of machine learning models for automated glaucoma detection using multimodal clinical, structural, and functional data from a West African clinical cohort. MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, we analyzed clinical records from two major eye care centers in Ghana. A total of 605 eyes from 417 patients who underwent comprehensive glaucoma evaluation were included. Extracted features included demographic data, intraocular pressure, optical coherence tomography (OCT) structural parameters, and Humphrey visual field indices. We assessed the diagnostic performance of individual parameters using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Supervised machine learning classifiers, including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), were trained using a forward feature selection approach and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. We assessed model performance by computing performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). ResultsAmong the 605 eyes analyzed, 361 (59.7%) were glaucomatous, and 244 (40.3%) were healthy. Individual structural and functional parameters demonstrated moderate discriminative ability, while age showed no significant diagnostic value (AUC = 0.49, p = 0.841). Among machine learning models, the MLP achieved the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.92], sensitivity = 0.88, specificity = 0.86), outperforming SVM (AUC = 0.82), RF (AUC = 0.78), and GBM (AUC = 0.77). Multimodal integration of clinical, structural, and functional features improved discrimination compared with individual parameters. ConclusionsMultimodal machine learning models can effectively automate glaucoma detection using routinely collected clinical data. In this West African cohort, an MLP-based approach demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with traditional machine learning models and individual clinical metrics. These findings highlight the potential of clinically grounded artificial intelligence tools to support glaucoma diagnosis and triage in resource-constrained eye care settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rates of Glaucoma Progression Derived from Linear Mixed Models Using Varied Random Effect Distributions 97%
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 96%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 97%
- Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks 96%
- Towards implementation of AI in New Zealand national screening program: Cloud-based, Robust, and Bespoke 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: a systematic review 97%
- Self-supervised contrastive learning improves machine learning discrimination of full thickness macular holes from epiretinal membranes in retinal OCT scans 95%
- An Inherently Interpretable AI model improves Screening Speed and Accuracy for Early Diabetic Retinopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 96%
- Autonomous Screening for Laser Photocoagulation in Fundus Images Using Deep Learning 95%
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.