Back

Personalized Morphology, Replication Timing, and RNA based Gene Expression Networks for Basal-like and Classical subtyping genes in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Leyva, A.; Niazi, M. K. K.

2026-03-16 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.12.711434 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Network biology traditionally identifies gene correlations that reflect biological pathways. While LIONESS enables individualized gene networks, the influence of replication timing on these correlations remains unexplored. Replication timing reflects the temporal order of DNA synthesis and is tightly linked to chromatin state, methylation, and transcriptional stability, all of which affect tumor behavior. Integrating replication-timing proxies derived from methylation data therefore offers a bridge between epigenetic state and functional gene coordination, while morphology provides an additional route for inferring gene expression. This is the first study to integrate replication-timing proxies and morphological embeddings into individualized LIONESS gene networks. The aim is to determine how replication timing and morphology derived from bulk methylation and image embeddings influence gene coexpression in pancreatic cancer. Patient-specific networks were generated for basal and classical pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma subtypes using TCGA data. Results show an 80% AUC for RNA-replication-timing-based subtype prediction modules and a 75% AUC for morphology-based networks. Incorporating replication timing and morphology increased network robustness while maintaining classification performance. Notably, the 80% AUC was achieved using only 17 of the 50 Moffitt genes, with 16 overlapping the PURIST gene set, indicating that replication timing captures clinically relevant regulatory structure. These findings suggest that replication-timing proxies can act as epigenetic indicators of mechanistic gene coordination and may help identify patients with distinct replication stress or chromatin accessibility profiles relevant to therapeutic response.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.8%
3
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.3%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
10
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
12
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
NAR Cancer
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
26
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%