Back

Bayesian Joint Longitudinal-Survival Modeling of Functional Recovery Trajectories and Time to Independent Community Ambulation Following Robotic Exoskeleton-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: A Multi-Centre Cohort Study in Canada

Lim, A.; Desai, P.

2026-03-16 health economics
10.64898/2026.03.12.26348287 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRobotic exoskeleton-assisted gait training (RAGT) has emerged as a promising modality for post-stroke rehabilitation. However, the longitudinal trajectory of functional recovery and its association with clinically meaningful milestones such as independent community ambulation remain poorly characterised. Standard analytical approaches that treat longitudinal and survival outcomes separately may yield biased estimates due to informative dropout and the endogenous nature of time-varying functional measures. ObjectiveTo jointly model the longitudinal trajectory of lower-extremity motor function and time to independent community ambulation following RAGT for stroke survivors, while accounting for the mutual dependence between the two processes using a Bayesian joint modelling framework. MethodsA multi-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted across four Canadian rehabilitation hospitals (2019 to 2024). A total of 327 adults with first-ever ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke who received RAGT using the EksoNR or Indego exoskeleton platforms were included. The primary longitudinal outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) score measured at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 52. The survival outcome was time to achieving independent community ambulation (Functional Ambulation Category score of 4 or higher sustained for at least two consecutive assessments). A Bayesian shared-parameter joint model was specified, linking a nonlinear mixed-effects longitudinal submodel to a Weibull proportional hazards survival submodel through the current value and slope of the subject-specific FMA-LE trajectory. Estimation was performed using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling with four chains of 5,000 iterations each (2,500 warmup). ResultsThe median age was 62.4 years (IQR 54.1 to 71.8), 58.1% were male, and 63.0% had ischaemic stroke aetiology. The longitudinal submodel revealed a nonlinear recovery pattern best described by a three-knot restricted cubic spline, with rapid improvement during the first 12 weeks (mean gain 8.7 FMA-LE points, 95% CrI 7.2 to 10.3) followed by a plateau phase. The association parameter linking the current FMA-LE value to the hazard of achieving community ambulation was 0.084 (95% CrI 0.061 to 0.109), indicating that each one-point increase in the subject-specific FMA-LE trajectory was associated with an 8.8% increase in the instantaneous hazard (HR = 1.088, 95% CrI 1.063 to 1.115). The trajectory slope parameter was also significant (0.043, 95% CrI 0.012 to 0.078), suggesting that patients with steeper recovery gradients had additional survival advantages beyond their current functional level. At 52 weeks, 54.7% of participants achieved independent community ambulation. Haemorrhagic stroke (HR = 0.68, 95% CrI 0.49 to 0.93), older age (HR per decade = 0.81, 95% CrI 0.70 to 0.94), and higher baseline NIHSS score (HR per point = 0.94, 95% CrI 0.91 to 0.97) were associated with lower hazards of achieving the ambulation milestone. ConclusionsThe Bayesian joint model revealed that both the current functional level and the rate of functional change are independently predictive of achieving community ambulation following RAGT. These findings support individualised rehabilitation planning where treatment intensity may be dynamically adjusted based on the evolving recovery trajectory, and provide further evidence for the clinical value of robotic exoskeleton interventions in stroke rehabilitation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.9%
2
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
4
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
12
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
19
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
23
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%