Back

Theta deep-brain stimulation improves 1 cognitive performance in Parkinson's patients with cognitive impairments

Cole, R.; Cavanagh, J.; Zhang, Q.; Groth, C.; Vivanco-Suarez, J.; Espinoza, A. I.; Greenlee, J.; Narayanan, N.

2026-03-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.12.26348246 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatients with Parkinsons disease (PD) almost inevitably experience cognitive impairments. These deficits have been linked to low frequency "theta" cortical activity [~]4 Hz, previously associated with cognitive control. ObjectiveOur study investigated effects of 4 Hz subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on cognitive performance in PD patients with cognitive impairments. MethodsWe recruited 17 PD participants with (n=10) and without (n=7) cognitive impairment. In these patients, we compared motor and cognitive performance during 4 Hz STN DBS, typical DBS for motor symptoms of PD ([~]130Hz) and DBS OFF. Motor performance was tested by Part III of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS-III). Cognitive performance was tested during performance of the Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT), which requires conflict resolution to respond accurately. ResultsMotor function improved with 4 Hz STN DBS and further improved with [~]130 Hz STN DBS. Compared to DBS OFF, reaction times were decreased during 4 Hz STN DBS and were further decreased at [~]130 Hz. Strikingly, 4 Hz DBS alone improved accuracy compared to both DBS OFF and compared to [~]130 Hz STN DBS. ConclusionsThese data suggest that theta-frequency 4 Hz STN stimulation is effective in PD patients with cognitive impairments. Our findings will help guide new therapies targeted at improving cognitive dysfunction in PD and could broaden applications for low-frequency brain stimulation.

Published in npj Parkinson's Disease (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.