Back

First-Trimester Multi-modal cfDNA Analysis for Prediction of Preterm and Term Preeclampsia

Ertl, R.; Syngelaki, A.; Frank, O.; Lueftinger, L.; Lukacova, E.; Lumby, C.; Stuetz, A.; Beisken, S.; Posch, A. E.; Nicolaides, K. H.

2026-03-13 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.03.12.26348234 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPreeclampsia, which is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity, represents a biologically heterogeneous syndrome. First-trimester screening with the Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model enables prevention of preterm preeclampsia through aspirin prophylaxis but depends on Doppler velocimetry and biochemical measurements that limit scalability and offer limited discrimination for term disease. A unified, molecular first trimester test capable of stratifying risk across the full clinical spectrum of preeclampsia has not been established. ObjectiveTo determine whether multi-modal, tissue-resolved analysis of first trimester circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), obtained during routine non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), enables early prediction of both preterm and term preeclampsia. Study DesignThis nested case-control study included 125 singleton pregnancies sampled at 11-14 weeks gestation after quality control (48 controls, 30 preterm preeclampsia, 47 term preeclampsia). For 80 pregnancies, matched placental villi and maternal buffy coat samples were available to derive tissue reference profiles. Plasma cfDNA underwent multi-modal sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies, enabling tissue-resolved analysis of fragmentomic and epigenetic signatures. Separate ensemble machine-learning classifiers were developed for preterm (<37 weeks) and term ([&ge;]37 weeks) preeclampsia using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Model discrimination was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity at predefined specificity thresholds, and comparison with the FMF first-trimester risk score. A population-level simulation of 100,000 pregnancies, applying incidence point estimates of 2.5% for preterm and 7.5% for term PE, was used to derive predictive values and likelihood ratios. ResultsThe multi-modal cfDNA classifier achieved an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.85 (0.77-0.91) for preterm preeclampsia and 0.84 (0.76-0.91) for term preeclampsia. The FMF score yielded an AUROC of 0.80 (0.70-0.89) for preterm and 0.53 (0.43-0.63) for term PE. At 80% specificity, cfDNA sensitivity was 70.5% for preterm and 72.1% for term preeclampsia, demonstrating improved discrimination for term disease compared with FMF screening. In simulated population-level analysis, positive likelihood ratios were 4.25 (preterm) and 3.83 (term), with negative likelihood ratios of 0.21 and 0.34, respectively, supporting meaningful post-test risk stratification and strong rule-out performance. ConclusionFirst-trimester multi-modal, tissue-resolved cfDNA analysis enables early risk stratification across the full clinical spectrum of preeclampsia from a single routine blood sample. Compared with FMF screening, this approach can potentially improve discrimination for term preeclampsia while providing incremental improvement for preterm disease. The potential for integration into existing NIPT workflows offers a scalable pathway toward unified precision prevention, supporting timely aspirin prophylaxis for preterm preeclampsia and risk-adapted surveillance strategies for term disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.3%
3
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.5%
5
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
20
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%