Back

Ultrasound Time-Harmonic Elastography: Habitat Viscosity and Tumor Stiffness Heterogeneity for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Liver Lesions

Spiesecke, P.; Wolff, M.; Fischer, T.; Sack, I.; Meyer, T.

2026-03-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.12.26348218 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTumor progression is associated with alterations in tissue mechanical properties. Experimental studies in cancer mechanobiology suggest that increased viscosity of the tumor habitat can promote tumor growth, while malignant tumors often exhibit pronounced mechanical heterogeneity with coexisting soft and rigid regions that facilitate cell motility. Elastography enables noninvasive viscoelastic profiling of soft-tissue properties in vivo and may therefore detect tumor malignancy. PurposeTo investigate whether multiparametric external vibration-based ultrasound time-harmonic elastography (THE) can differentiate benign from malignant liver tumors and identify viscoelastic parameters associated with tumor malignancy. Materials and MethodsIn this prospective study conducted from January 2025 to March 2026, 94 patients with focal liver lesions underwent THE. Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis (41 benign, 39 malignant; 45 women; age range 30-87 years). Liver and tumor stiffness (shear wave speed; SWS), viscosity (loss angle; {phi}), and spatial mechanical heterogeneity (spatial standard deviation, SWS-SD) were quantified. Diagnostic performance for differentiating benign and malignant tumors was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsTumor heterogeneity and surrounding habitat viscosity provided the most pronounced differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. Malignant tumors demonstrated higher SWS-SD (0.41{+/-}0.20 vs. 0.28{+/-}0.11 m/s) and increased {phi} (0.76{+/-}0.09 vs. 0.71{+/-}0.05 rad) with a combined discriminative power of AUC=0.72. These viscoelastic differences were more pronounced in larger tumors of [≥]2.5 cm2 area (SWS-SD: 0.47{+/-}0.19 vs. 0.32{+/-}0.11 m/s; {phi}: 0.78{+/-}0.10 vs 0.70{+/-}0.04 rad) yielding AUC=0.88 while excellent discriminative power of AUC=0.97 for [≥]6 cm2 tumor area. ConclusionElevated viscosity of the tumor habitat combined with increased tumor stiffness-heterogeneity measured by multiparametric THE can differentiate liver malignancies from benign liver lesions. THE may thus provide a rapid, cost-effective approach for viscoelastic profiling of liver tumors in clinical diagnostic imaging.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
23.0%
2
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%