Back

Ultrasound Time-Harmonic Elastography: Habitat Viscosity and Tumor Stiffness Heterogeneity for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Liver Lesions

Spiesecke, P.; Wolff, M.; Fischer, T.; Sack, I.; Meyer, T.

2026-03-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.12.26348218 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTumor progression is associated with alterations in tissue mechanical properties. Experimental studies in cancer mechanobiology suggest that increased viscosity of the tumor habitat can promote tumor growth, while malignant tumors often exhibit pronounced mechanical heterogeneity with coexisting soft and rigid regions that facilitate cell motility. Elastography enables noninvasive viscoelastic profiling of soft-tissue properties in vivo and may therefore detect tumor malignancy. PurposeTo investigate whether multiparametric external vibration-based ultrasound time-harmonic elastography (THE) can differentiate benign from malignant liver tumors and identify viscoelastic parameters associated with tumor malignancy. Materials and MethodsIn this prospective study conducted from January 2025 to March 2026, 94 patients with focal liver lesions underwent THE. Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis (41 benign, 39 malignant; 45 women; age range 30-87 years). Liver and tumor stiffness (shear wave speed; SWS), viscosity (loss angle; {phi}), and spatial mechanical heterogeneity (spatial standard deviation, SWS-SD) were quantified. Diagnostic performance for differentiating benign and malignant tumors was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsTumor heterogeneity and surrounding habitat viscosity provided the most pronounced differentiation between malignant and benign lesions. Malignant tumors demonstrated higher SWS-SD (0.41{+/-}0.20 vs. 0.28{+/-}0.11 m/s) and increased {phi} (0.76{+/-}0.09 vs. 0.71{+/-}0.05 rad) with a combined discriminative power of AUC=0.72. These viscoelastic differences were more pronounced in larger tumors of [≥]2.5 cm2 area (SWS-SD: 0.47{+/-}0.19 vs. 0.32{+/-}0.11 m/s; {phi}: 0.78{+/-}0.10 vs 0.70{+/-}0.04 rad) yielding AUC=0.88 while excellent discriminative power of AUC=0.97 for [≥]6 cm2 tumor area. ConclusionElevated viscosity of the tumor habitat combined with increased tumor stiffness-heterogeneity measured by multiparametric THE can differentiate liver malignancies from benign liver lesions. THE may thus provide a rapid, cost-effective approach for viscoelastic profiling of liver tumors in clinical diagnostic imaging.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.8%
3
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
5
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
7
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
8
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
9
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
10
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
11
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
12
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
13
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%