Back

Opportunities for cost reduction of current first-line WHO-recommended oral antiretroviral therapy: replacing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with tenofovir alafenamide

Jamieson, L.; Venter, W. D. F.; Meyer-Rath, G.

2026-03-13 health economics
10.64898/2026.03.12.26348214 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionDolutegravir-based first-line antiretroviral therapy (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, and dolutegravir; TLD) has delivered substantial clinical and public health benefits. However, sharply decreasing funding for HIV programmes necessitates cost reduction within current treatment guidelines. We evaluated whether replacing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with tenofovir alafenamide (TAFLD), a drug with equivalent effectiveness and side effect profile, could reduce HIV treatment costs in South Africa. MethodsWe conducted a budget-impact analysis over 2026-2030 from the provider-perspective. The cost of antiretroviral treatment (ART) provision with either TLD or TAFLD was estimated using ingredients-based costing, including the cost of drugs, laboratory monitoring, staff, consumables, equipment and overheads. Costs are reported in 2025 USD, are undiscounted and not inflated. Population estimates for adults on first-line therapy were derived from Thembisa 4.8. We modelled a phased transition from TLD to TAFLD over two years, and explored sensitivity to TAFLD price variation ({+/-}15%) and inclusion of creatinine monitoring. ResultsTAFLD reduced per-patient annual costs by 4-5% compared with TLD (from US$178 to US$169, and US$287 to US$277, for first and follow-up years, respectively). At full replacement, total programme savings were approximately US$54 million per year (-5%). Even with continued creatinine monitoring, TAFLD remained cost-saving, reducing annual costs by around 4%. Savings increased to 8% if TAFLD prices were 15% lower than base-case assumptions. ConclusionsReplacing TDF with TAF in first-line antiretroviral therapy could generate meaningful cost savings for South Africa with minimal programme disruption. While long-term metabolic effects require consideration, TAFLD represents a feasible interim cost-reduction strategy while awaiting next-generation HIV therapies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
3
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
15
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
18
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
21
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
22
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
23
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
25
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%