Back

Automated Segmentation of Head and Neck Cancer from CT Images Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks

Prabhanjans, P.; Punathil, A. N.; V K, A.; Thomas T, H. M.; Sasidharan, B. K.; Shaikh, H.; Varghese, A. J.; Kuchipudi, R. B.; Pavamani, S.; Rajan, J.

2026-03-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.12.26347996 medRxiv
Show abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) requires accurate tumor delineation for effective radiotherapy planning. Manual segmentation of tumor regions is time-consuming and subject to considerable inter-observer variability. Although several automated approaches have been proposed, many rely on multimodal imaging such as PET/CT, which is expensive, less accessible in many clinical settings, and increases the burden on patients. In this work, we investigate a CT-only three-dimensional segmentation framework that provides a clinically practical and resource-efficient alternative. CT images of 136 head and neck cancer patients from the publicly available HN1 dataset in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were used along with 30 additional cases from a private dataset collected at a tertiary care centre, Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore, India. A fully automated segmentation model was developed to delineate the primary gross tumor volume (GTV) using the 3D nnU-Net framework. The models were trained using the HN1 dataset and an extended HN1+CMC dataset that included the additional private cases. Performance was evaluated using three-fold cross-validation with standard segmentation metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), and the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95). The proposed CT-based model achieved a Global Dice of 0.63 and a Median Dice of 0.60 on the HN1 dataset. When the additional CMC cases were incorporated during training, the performance improved to a Global Dice of 0.65 and a Median Dice of 0.71. These results demonstrate that 3D nnU-Net can effectively segment head and neck tumors from CT images alone. The proposed CT-only approach provides a cost-effective and scalable solution that can support radiotherapy treatment planning and help reduce variability in clinical workflows.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
3
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
7
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
8
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
10
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
21
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%