Automated Segmentation of Head and Neck Cancer from CT Images Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks
Prabhanjans, P.; Punathil, A. N.; V K, A.; Thomas T, H. M.; Sasidharan, B. K.; Shaikh, H.; Varghese, A. J.; Kuchipudi, R. B.; Pavamani, S.; Rajan, J.
Show abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) requires accurate tumor delineation for effective radiotherapy planning. Manual segmentation of tumor regions is time-consuming and subject to considerable inter-observer variability. Although several automated approaches have been proposed, many rely on multimodal imaging such as PET/CT, which is expensive, less accessible in many clinical settings, and increases the burden on patients. In this work, we investigate a CT-only three-dimensional segmentation framework that provides a clinically practical and resource-efficient alternative. CT images of 136 head and neck cancer patients from the publicly available HN1 dataset in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were used along with 30 additional cases from a private dataset collected at a tertiary care centre, Christian Medical College (CMC), Vellore, India. A fully automated segmentation model was developed to delineate the primary gross tumor volume (GTV) using the 3D nnU-Net framework. The models were trained using the HN1 dataset and an extended HN1+CMC dataset that included the additional private cases. Performance was evaluated using three-fold cross-validation with standard segmentation metrics including Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), and the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95). The proposed CT-based model achieved a Global Dice of 0.63 and a Median Dice of 0.60 on the HN1 dataset. When the additional CMC cases were incorporated during training, the performance improved to a Global Dice of 0.65 and a Median Dice of 0.71. These results demonstrate that 3D nnU-Net can effectively segment head and neck tumors from CT images alone. The proposed CT-only approach provides a cost-effective and scalable solution that can support radiotherapy treatment planning and help reduce variability in clinical workflows.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- “E Pluribus Unum”: Prospective acceptability benchmarking from the Contouring Collaborative for Consensus in Radiation Oncology (C3RO) Crowdsourced Initiative for Multi-Observer Segmentation 95%
- The Effect of Image Resolution on Automated Classification of Chest X-rays 94%
- Quantifying Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in 3D U-Net Segmentation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 94%
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 94%
- A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Rectal Tumor Segmentation with Anomaly Fusion Derived from Anatomical Inpainting: A Multicenter Study 95%
- Effective Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting COVID-19 Outcomes from Chest Computed Tomography Volumes 95%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.