Back

Bayesian AMMI-Based Simulation of Genotype x Environment Interactions

Lee, H.; Segae, V. S.; Garcia-Abadillo, J.; de Oliveira Bussiman, F.; Trujano Chavez, M. Z.; Hidalgo, J.; Jarquin, D.

2026-03-15 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.11.711188 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) has been studied to identify environment-stable/favorable genotypes. The GEI simulation could help refine the inference by incorporating tangible factors such as genomic and environmental information. The Bayesian additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (Bayesian AMMI) model captures the genotype-specific responses across environments, reflecting directional relationships between genotypes and environments. Thus, we propose a Bayesian AMMI-based GEI simulation framework that utilizes high-throughput environmental covariance matrices to generate GEI effects with interpretable directional structure. To demonstrate the proposed approach, two simulated phenotypes were assessed under four levels of GEI variance. In the first simulation (Sim1), GEI effects were sampled from a multivariate normal distribution defined by the GEI matrix. In the second simulation (Sim2), GEI effects were generated by extending Sim1 with the Bayesian AMMI model. In both simulations, increasing GEI variance resulted in lower correlations of phenotypes across environments and stronger genotype-specific sensitivity to environmental variation. Across five cross-validation designs, models accounting for GEI consistently outperformed one that did not, with prediction accuracy generally decreasing as GEI variance increased. Clear distinctions between the two simulated phenotypes were evident from biplot analyses: Sim2 successfully captured environmental relatedness and genotype-specific responses, whereas such structure was absent in Sim1. These results demonstrate that the proposed Bayesian AMMI-based GEI simulation framework enables interpretable visualization of GEI and supports genomic selection strategies under complex environmental conditions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
3
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
5
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Genetics Selection Evolution
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
25
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
29
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%