Back

Tuning the Structural Properties of a Single-Domain Antibody Scaffold for Improved Fibroblast Activation Protein Targeting

Ott, K.; Gallant, J.; Kwon, O.; Adeniyi, A.; Bednarz, B.; Barrett, K.; Rosenkrans, Z.; Mixdorf, J.; Engle, J.; Aluicio Sarduy, E.; Hernandez, R. T.; LeBeau, A.

2026-03-13 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.11.711127 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is an attractive target for the development of cancer theranostics due to its selective expression on cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). While a number of small-molecule FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) have been developed, few biologics have been investigated as FAP targeting vectors. Camelid-derived single-domain antibodies, or variable-heavy-heavy domains (VHHs), offer a compelling alternative, combining high affinity with versatile engineering options. In this study, we first identified a novel anti-FAP VHH, F7, from an affinity-matured camelid phage display library. To investigate how valency and molecular weight affected target engagement and in vivo properties, F7 was engineered into three formats: a monomer (F7), a tethered dimer (F7D), and an Fc-fusion protein (F7-Fc). All three were specific for FAP with the two bivalent constructs demonstrating picomolar affinity. Positron emission tomography imaging in FAP-positive xenograft models revealed distinct pharmacokinetic profiles across constructs with notable differences in tumor uptake and clearance. F7 had rapid uptake and clearance resulting in significantly higher tumor uptake than FAPI-46. Low molecular weight bivalent F7D demonstrated similar kinetics but was retained by the tumor resulting in a high tumor-to-blood ratio with secondary uptake limited to clearance organs. The largest construct, F7-Fc, resulted in the highest tumor uptake and allowed for longitudinal imaging. Absorbed dose calculations confirmed that tumors received significantly higher radiation doses compared to normal tissues. These findings demonstrate that tuning VHH scaffold size and valency can improve biodistribution and retention, establishing F7-based constructs as promising targeting vectors for FAP.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
2
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
4
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
Bioconjugate Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
20
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Angewandte Chemie
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
22
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%