Back

Mechanistic insights into the color transformation of a non-FRET substrate for RNase activity detection

Kim, S.; Hong, S.; Walker, J. N.; He, Y.; Nguyen, A.-T.; Chen, W.-R.; Seifi, S.; Chen, Y.-I.; Kuo, Y.-A.; Brodbelt, J. S.; Yeh, H.-C.

2026-03-13 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.11.710959 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA-templated silver nanoclusters (DNA/AgNCs) have created a new class of non-FRET DNase substrates, termed Subak, that exhibits a color change upon DNase digestion. Although Subak substrates offer advantages such as ratiometric readouts and low manufacturing costs over traditional FRET substrates, the mechanism governing AgNC color switching remains unclear. Here, using a site-specific cleavage strategy, we identify color-switching hotspots and demonstrate that AgNC transformation can be controlled by the cleavage positions within the nucleic acid host. Our data support a cleavage-driven reorganization of the AgNC coordination environment, converting a non-emissive precursor into a red-emitting cluster, rather than direct enzyme-cluster interactions. Leveraging this insight, we engineer rSubak, an RNA-incorporated Subak that displays 95 nm red shift (530 to 625 nm) upon RNase cleavage. In amplification-free CRISPR/Cas13 assays for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A (A/H5N1), and measles viruses (MV) detection, rSubak achieved a limit of detection of 0.3 pM, superior to that of the commercial RNaseAlert ([~]250 pM). Collectively, our results establish Subak as a generalizable, non-FRET platform for sensitive ratiometric reporting the activities of diverse nucleases.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Chemical Society
● 217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Chemistry
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Nanotechnology
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
ACS Central Science
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
7
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
8
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
9
ACS Sensors
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
10
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.1%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
13
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
RSC Chemical Biology
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Nano Letters
● 71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
20
ACS Chemical Biology
● 167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
22
Advanced Functional Materials
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Cell Chemical Biology
○ 94 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Nature Biomedical Engineering
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Advanced Materials
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Chemical Communications
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
Small
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.