Back

Ac-DOTA-TATE in SSTR2-positive tumor models

Desai, P.; Mewis, D.; Huber, M.; Sturzbecher-Hoehne, M.; Ruediger, M.; Gericke, G.; Jaekel, A.

2026-03-14 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.11.709316 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is highly expressed in neuroendocrine tumors including small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and represents a validated target for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The SSTR2 agonist [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is clinically approved, however, treatment resistance and relapse occur. The SSTR2 antagonist SSO110 (DOTA-JR11, OPS201) demonstrates higher tumor uptake and longer retention than DOTA-TATE both pre-clinically and clinically. We performed a systemic head-to-head comparison of SSO110 labeled with various radionuclides of distinct emission characteristics to identify the optimal radionuclide for SSO110 and to compare antagonist with agonist performance. MethodsSSO110 was radiolabeled with 177Lu, 161Tb, 212Pb, and 225Ac. Biodistribution was assessed in AR42J and NCI-H69 xenograft models. Therapeutic efficacy of single and fractionated [212Pb]Pb-SSO110 was compared with [177Lu]Lu-SSO110 in NCI-H69 tumors. Single-dose efficacy of 225Ac-, 161Tb-, and 177Lu-labeled SSO110 was evaluated in both models. [{superscript 2}{superscript 2}Ac]Ac-DOTA-TATE served as agonist comparator. Tumor growth, survival, safety parameters, and tumor absorbed doses were analyzed. ResultsAll SSO110 radioconjugates demonstrated comparable biodistribution with high tumor uptake and favorable tumor-to-kidney ratios. In NCI-H69 tumors, [212Pb]Pb-SSO110 induced dose-dependent tumor growth delay but did not improve anti-tumor efficacy compared with [177Lu]u-SSO110 under single or fractionated regimens. [161Tb]Tb-SSO110 showed efficacy comparable to [177Lu]Lu-SSO110 in NCI-H69 model and significantly improved tumor growth delay in high-SSTR2-expressing AR42J tumors. Across both models, [225Ac]Ac-SSO110 demonstrated the highest therapeutic potency, inducing durable tumor regression and 100% survival at clinically relevant activities. [225Ac]Ac-SSO110 also outperformed the agonist comparator [225Ac]Ac-DOTA-TATE. Dosimetry analysis revealed a 63-fold higher tumor absorbed dose per injected administered activity for [225Ac]Ac-SSO110 compared with [212Pb]Pb-SSO110. All treatments were well tolerated without significant renal or hepatic toxicity. ConclusionTherapeutic efficacy of SSTR2-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy appears to benefit from alignment between radionuclide physical half-life and ligand tumor residence time. Among the radionuclides evaluated, [225Ac]Ac-SSO110 demonstrated the most pronounced and durable anti-tumor efficacy, outperforming [161Tb]Tb-SSO110, [177Lu]Lu-SSO110, and the short-lived -emitter [212Pb]Pb-SSO110. These findings support clinical investigation of [225Ac]Ac-SSO110 in SSTR2-positive malignancies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.5%
2
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
4
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
6
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Bioconjugate Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
19
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%