Evaluating the impact of Pharmacare on youth with mental health needs: a regression discontinuity analysis of unmet health care and life stress
Cao, P.; Bai, Y.; Ienciu, K.; Ehi, G.; Chum, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCanadas youth are facing mental health crises due to barriers in accessing timely and affordable care. Ontarios OHIP+ pharmacare program, introduced in 2018, provided free prescription drug coverage to individuals under 25. While OHIP+ increased prescription use, its effects on perceived access and well-being among youth with mental health needs remain unclear. MethodsWe used a regression discontinuity design leveraging the OHIP+ age-eligibility cutoff at 25 to estimate its causal impact on unmet health care needs and self-perceived life stress. The sample included Ontario respondents aged 20-29 (n=1,053) from the 2018-2019 Canadian Community Health Survey who reported needing mental health support. Outcomes were self-reported unmet health care needs and a 5-point life stress scale. Models adjusted for sociodemographic factors and used age in months as the running variable. ResultsLoss of OHIP+ eligibility at age 25 was associated with a 19.0 percentage-point increase in the probability of reporting unmet health care needs (95% CI: 0.5 to 37.6 percentage points) and a 1.33-point increase in perceived life stress (95% CI: 0.45 to 2.21). These effects were consistent across subgroups and robust to multiple sensitivity tests. ConclusionOHIP+ improved access and reduced stress among youth with mental health needs while coverage was in place. However, the abrupt loss of eligibility at age 25 increased unmet needs and psychological strain, underscoring the need for continuous, inclusive pharmacare to support youth well-being. What is already known on this topicPublic drug coverage programs such as OHIP+ have been shown to increase prescription drug use among youth in Ontario, Canada. However, little is known about whether such programs improve patient-perceived outcomes. Existing evaluations have largely relied on descriptive data or aggregate prescribing trends, with few studies examining individual-level outcomes using quasi-experimental methods. What this study addsUsing a regression discontinuity design, this study provides the causal evidence that the OHIP+ pharmacare program reduced unmet health care needs and life stress among youth with perceived mental health concerns while they remained eligible for coverage. The findings show that the abrupt loss of eligibility at age 25 was associated with increased unmet needs and heightened stress, suggesting that age-based cutoffs in drug coverage may disrupt care and contribute to psychological strain during a critical life stage. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThis study suggests that universal drug coverage programs should ensure continuity through young adulthood to avoid worsening access gaps. The findings support the need for a national pharmacare framework that promotes equitable and sustained health support.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographic and Mental Health Predictors of Mental Health Service Use Across Provider Types 94%
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 92%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term Public Healthcare Burden Associated with Intimate Partner Violence among Canadian Women: A Cohort Study 93%
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 89%
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 92%
- Factors Associated with COVID-19 Testing among People who Inject Drugs: Missed Opportunities for Reaching those Most at Risk 92%
- Ethnic inequalities in multiple long-term health conditions in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving our understanding of the social determinants of mental health: A data linkage study of mental health records and the 2011 UK census 92%
- Assessing and predicting adolescent and early adulthood common mental disorders in the ALSPAC cohort using electronic primary care data 92%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 91%
- Association between physical multimorbidity and common mental health disorders in rural and urban Malawian settings: preliminary findings from Healthy Lives Malawi long-term conditions survey 91%
- Maternal adverse childhood experiences on child growth and development in rural Pakistan: an observational cohort study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.