Back

Evaluating the impact of Pharmacare on youth with mental health needs: a regression discontinuity analysis of unmet health care and life stress

Cao, P.; Bai, Y.; Ienciu, K.; Ehi, G.; Chum, A.

2026-03-12 health policy
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348184 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCanadas youth are facing mental health crises due to barriers in accessing timely and affordable care. Ontarios OHIP+ pharmacare program, introduced in 2018, provided free prescription drug coverage to individuals under 25. While OHIP+ increased prescription use, its effects on perceived access and well-being among youth with mental health needs remain unclear. MethodsWe used a regression discontinuity design leveraging the OHIP+ age-eligibility cutoff at 25 to estimate its causal impact on unmet health care needs and self-perceived life stress. The sample included Ontario respondents aged 20-29 (n=1,053) from the 2018-2019 Canadian Community Health Survey who reported needing mental health support. Outcomes were self-reported unmet health care needs and a 5-point life stress scale. Models adjusted for sociodemographic factors and used age in months as the running variable. ResultsLoss of OHIP+ eligibility at age 25 was associated with a 19.0 percentage-point increase in the probability of reporting unmet health care needs (95% CI: 0.5 to 37.6 percentage points) and a 1.33-point increase in perceived life stress (95% CI: 0.45 to 2.21). These effects were consistent across subgroups and robust to multiple sensitivity tests. ConclusionOHIP+ improved access and reduced stress among youth with mental health needs while coverage was in place. However, the abrupt loss of eligibility at age 25 increased unmet needs and psychological strain, underscoring the need for continuous, inclusive pharmacare to support youth well-being. What is already known on this topicPublic drug coverage programs such as OHIP+ have been shown to increase prescription drug use among youth in Ontario, Canada. However, little is known about whether such programs improve patient-perceived outcomes. Existing evaluations have largely relied on descriptive data or aggregate prescribing trends, with few studies examining individual-level outcomes using quasi-experimental methods. What this study addsUsing a regression discontinuity design, this study provides the causal evidence that the OHIP+ pharmacare program reduced unmet health care needs and life stress among youth with perceived mental health concerns while they remained eligible for coverage. The findings show that the abrupt loss of eligibility at age 25 was associated with increased unmet needs and heightened stress, suggesting that age-based cutoffs in drug coverage may disrupt care and contribute to psychological strain during a critical life stage. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThis study suggests that universal drug coverage programs should ensure continuity through young adulthood to avoid worsening access gaps. The findings support the need for a national pharmacare framework that promotes equitable and sustained health support.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.6%
4
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
16
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
18
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%