Back

Wellbeing While Waiting: Effectiveness and implementation of youth social prescribing for young people awaiting CAMHS support.

Hayes, D.; Wright, J.; Burton, A.; Bu, F.; Sticpewich, L.; Stuttard, H.; Page, J.; Bradbury, A.; Han, E.; Deighton, J.; Tibber, M. S.; Talwar, S.; Fancourt, D.

2026-03-12 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348130 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProlonged waiting times for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) leave many young people without structured support while awaiting specialist treatment. Social prescribing has been proposed as a community-based adjunct within CAMHS pathways; however, evidence regarding its safety and clinical impact remains limited. MethodsWellbeing While Waiting was a multi-site non-randomised controlled trial embedded within a hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness evaluation conducted across 11 CAMHS in England. The protocol was prospectively published prior to recruitment (BMC Psychiatry; 10.1186/s12888-023-04758-0). Between May 2023 and March 2025, 558 young people aged 11-18 years referred to CAMHS were enrolled (225 usual care; 333 social prescribing). Primary outcomes were anxiety and depression symptoms, total emotional and behavioural difficulties, and perceived stress. Secondary outcomes included resilience and wellbeing. ResultsNo intervention-related adverse events were observed. On average, participants had 5 sessions with a Link Worker. Compared with usual care, no significant differences were observed in anxiety or depression symptoms. However, participants receiving social prescribing demonstrated significant improvements in total emotional and behavioural difficulties over six months, driven by reductions in conduct difficulties, hyperactivity and peer problems. Significant improvements for those receiving social prescribing were also found for prosocial behaviour and resilience. ConclusionsWithin routine CAMHS pathways, no intervention-related adverse events were observed for social prescribing, and social prescribing was associated with improvements in behavioural and resilience-related outcomes, although not in anxiety or depressive symptoms. Findings suggest social prescribing may offer a valuable adjunct during delayed access to specialist treatment, with effects distinct from symptom-focused clinical therapies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
11
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
21
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%