Back

A whole-blood transcriptional signature associated with obstructive post-tuberculosis lung disease

Newby, R. E.; Kijaro, L.; Dill-McFarland, K. A.; Njagi, L. N.; Murithi, W. B.; Mwongera, Z.; Agata, M.; Byers, J.; Peterson, G. J.; Fennelly, K. P.; Nduba, V.; Horne, D. J.; Zifodya, J. S.; Hawn, T. R.

2026-03-12 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348051 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPost-tuberculosis (TB) lung disease (PTLD) affects approximately 50% of persons with pulmonary TB. We recently discovered whole blood transcriptional signatures associated with PTLD. We examined whether a minimum gene signature predicts PTLD as a clinically useful biomarker. MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 301 treatment naive adults with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB (PTB) (cohort A). We collected whole blood at 0 and 6-month visits, isolated RNA, and measured a modified MTB Host Response (HR) signature (mHR) based on expression of DUSP3, GBP5, and TMBIM6. We recorded spirometry at 6 (n=216) and 12 months (n=210) after treatment initiation and examined the association of the mHR score with PTLD and Mtb aerosolization. We recruited household contacts of cohort A to compare mHR score with non-PTB participants (cohort B). FindingsmHR was associated with TB (p=4.15e-66) when compared to HHCs, treatment response (p=1.07e-53), and characteristics including CD4 count (p=0.003), bacillary load (p=3.02e-05), lung cavities (p=1.59e-04), and lung quadrants involved (p=3.87e-06). The mHR score was not associated with Mtb aerosolization. In total, 105 (50%) participants had PTLD at 12 months including 61 with restriction, 26 with obstruction, and 18 with mixed obstruction and restriction. Baseline mHR was associated with obstructive PTLD at both 6 (p=0.003) and 12 months (p=0.012) in bivariate and multivariate analyses. The mHR score was not associated with restrictive lung disease. InterpretationBaseline mHR was associated with obstructive PTLD at 6 and 12 months and may have applications in targeting treatment and prognostication.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.8%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
5
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
19
Mucosal Immunology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
23
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
26
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.5%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%