MOSAIC: Explainable AI for Reproducible Histologic Grading and Prognostic Stratification in Breast Cancer
Sonpatki, P.; Gupta, S.; Biswas, A.; Patil, S.; Tyagi, S.; Balakrishnan, L.; Mistry, H.; Doshi, P.; Jagadale, K.; Shelke, P.; Parikh, L.; Shah, M.; Bharadwaj, R.; Desai, S.; Kulkarni, M.; Koppiker, C. B.; Prabhu, J.; Kachchhi, U.; Shah, N.
Show abstract
Nottingham histologic grading is essential for breast cancer prognostication but suffers from inter-observer variability in assessing mitotic activity, nuclear pleomorphism, and tubule formation. We developed MOSAIC (Mammary Oncology Spatial Analysis and Intelligent Classification), an explainable AI framework designed to perform component-wise grading by independently modeling these three histologic features. Model outputs were calibrated using a two-phase pathology study to establish clinically reproducible scoring thresholds and were subsequently evaluated across public datasets and multi-institutional Indian cohorts. MOSAIC demonstrated robust performance, with AI-derived grades providing independent prognostic information (HR >= 1.8 in two datasets, p = < 0.001) and improved survival stratification compared to traditional methods. In pathologist calibration studies, AI-assisted scoring significantly reduced variability, specifically achieving near-perfect agreement in mitotic scoring with a weighted {kappa} up to 0.98. Accuracy and Cohens kappa ({kappa}) analysis further characterized the models technical performance across components: Tubule formation showed the highest agreement (Accuracy >= 0.6607, {kappa} = 0.549), followed by overall Grade (Accuracy = 0.5637, {kappa} = 0.539) and Mitotic activity (Accuracy = 0.4985, {kappa} = 0.4), while Nuclear pleomorphism proved the most challenging (Accuracy = 0.3303, {kappa} = 0.271). Comparative survival models confirmed that AI-derived grades were more significant predictors of risk than manual pathologist-assigned grades, with the AI model yielding a superior global p-value (5.9 x 10-7) and lower AIC (769.61). These results indicate that MOSAIC enables reproducible, interpretable grading by decomposing assessment into pathology-aligned components. By enhancing consistency while preserving prognostic relevance, this framework supports explainable AI as a viable assistive tool for routine breast cancer pathology.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 96%
- Normal Breast Tissue (NBT)-Classifiers: Advancing Compartment Classification in Normal Breast Histology 95%
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated quantification of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer from H&E-stained slides using a transformer-based regression model 96%
- Lineage plasticity enables low-ER luminal tumors to evolve and gain basal-like traits 95%
- Mutational landscape of pure ductal carcinoma in situ and associations with disease prognosis and response to radiotherapy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Characterization of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Using Deep Learning 94%
- Artificial intelligence-driven morphology-based enrichment of malignant cells from body fluid 94%
- Stratification Of Chemotherapy-Treated Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Multiplexed Imaging And Single Cell Analysis Of T Cell Populations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 96%
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 95%
- Systematic benchmarking of imaging spatial transcriptomics platforms in FFPE tissues 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes Have Distinct Morphology and Immunophenotype in Obese Breast Cancer patients at Risk for Metastasis 93%
- Computer Vision Identifies Recurrent and Non-Recurrent Ductal Carcinoma in situ Lesions with Special Emphasis on African American Women 92%
- Detection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Grading Dysplasia on Histopathologic Slides Using Deep Learning 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.