Back

Efficient and Practical Framework for Bias Estimation in Spectral CT

Sandvold, O. F.; Proksa, R.; Perkins, A. E.; Noël, P. B.

2026-03-12 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.11.26346993 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSpectral computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used for quantitative imaging, yet accurate prediction of spectral quantitative bias remains challenging and computationally expensive with conventional approaches. Bias manifests as systematic deviations in reconstructed quantities (e.g., Hounsfield units, iodine density) from their true physical values. It arises from a combination of model mismatch, hardware/processing imperfections, exam-dependent factors, and noise-induced effects amplified by nonlinear operations such as the logarithmic transformation and material decomposition. PurposeWe present a practical, projection-based statistical framework to estimate noise-induced spectral bias efficiently, without the runtime burden of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. MethodsTo demonstrate the bias estimator, we modeled the central-ray of a clinical X-ray tube attenuating through a 300 mm patient-equivalent path with a 10 mm insert containing 10 mg/mL iodine. A 120 kVp tube voltage and tube currents from 100-350 mA were used. Ideal and realistic photon-counting detector responses were simulated across 50 bin threshold settings. Quantum Poisson noise was modeled, and Bayesian probabilities of material decomposition outputs centered on ground truth iodine and water bases were computed. Expected material decomposition outputs [Formula] were derived from a 2D probability map, and bias was measured. A simple Python Monte Carlo (MC) simulation served as a reference. ResultsThe proposed bias estimator closely matched MC-derived bias, with an average relative iodine bias percent difference between the estimators of 0.44% across all tube currents and bin thresholds. Average runtime of the bias estimator was only 0.5% of the MC simulation. Optimal thresholds for minimizing iodine noise (via the Cramer-Rao lower bound) differed from those minimizing iodine bias, highlighting key noise-bias tradeoffs. ConclusionEfficient spectral bias and noise estimation are essential for quantitative CT system design. This modular framework enables rapid, bias-aware optimization of spectral acquisition parameters and is adaptable to alternative spectral CT technologies beyond photon counting. Novelty and Significance of StudyPlease briefly (150 words or less) describe the novelty and/or significance of your study. Bias estimation is paramount for designing accurate spectral CT systems that deliver improved diagnostic performance. Traditional approaches rely on computationally intensive Monte Carlo simulations. We propose an efficient and practical bias estimator that uses Bayesian statistics and expected material decomposition values derived from a flexible, modular CT forward model. Unlike conventional Monte Carlo approaches, this framework enables rapid exploration of spectral design tradeoffs between bias and noise. We demonstrate both the accuracy and speed of this bias estimator relative to Monte Carlo approaches.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
7
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%