Back

Abiotic pollen loss: The neglected pollen fate

Anderson, B.; McCarren, S.; Sabino-Oliveira, A. C.; Lourenco Garcia de Brito, V. G.

2026-03-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.10.710827 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPollen production is a costly investment in angiosperm reproduction, yet only a small fraction of grains reach conspecific stigmas. While pollen loss to floral visitors is well studied, the role of abiotic factors in shaping pollen fate has been largely overlooked. Understanding the relative contributions of biotic and abiotic pollen loss pathways is essential for interpreting floral trait evolution and pollination efficiency. ResultsWe quantified abiotic pollen loss in four animal-pollinated species with contrasting floral longevities and reproductive phase dynamics. Flowers were monitored for five hours after anthesis, with pollen loss compared between unvisited flowers and those receiving single pollinator visits. Across all species, substantial pollen loss occurred in the absence of visitation, ranging from 37-57% of grains. In several cases, losses to legitimate pollinators were indistinguishable from abiotic loss alone, whereas pollen-foraging honeybees removed significantly greater fractions. ConclusionAbiotic factors can account for a large proportion of total pollen loss, sometimes equalling or exceeding pollinator-mediated removal. These findings challenge the assumption that pollen loss is primarily driven by pollinator activity and suggest that floral traits such as closure, gradual pollen release, and pollen packaging may function as adaptations that minimize environmental loss. Incorporating abiotic pollen loss into studies of pollen presentation and pollinator effectiveness provides a more complete understanding of selective pressures shaping floral evolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.6%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.3%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
4
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
8
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
22
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
26
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%