Back

Rational Design of Selective IL-2-based Activators for CAR T Cells Using AlphaFold3 and Physics-Informed Machine Learning

Dahmani, L. Z.; Banerjee, A.

2026-03-12 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.10.710391 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recombinant human Interleukin-2 (rhIL-2, Aldesleukin) is used in immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Low-dose IL-2 has been investigated for administration after adoptive T cell transfer to enhance CAR T expansion and sustain effector function. However, systemic IL-2 can cause severe toxicities and promote expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Previous attempts at mitigating cytokine-mediated side effects involved isolating CAR T cell signaling from endogenous immune responses by developing IL-2/IL-2R{beta} based selective ligand-receptors systems. Expressing these variant orthogonal (ortho)IL2-R{beta} receptors in CAR T cells and supplying variant orthoIL-2, was shown to dramatically improve selectivity in CAR T cell expansion and anti-tumoral potency in a leukemia mouse model. This study describes the computational design of synthetic orthogonal cytokine receptor-ligand systems based on the scaffolds of the human canonical IL-2 and IL-2R{beta}. Leveraging state-of-the-art AlphaFold3 (AF3) structure prediction capabilities and a physics-informed constrained sequence generator (CSG), the pipeline generates, filters and ranks sets of putative orthoIL-2/orthoIL-2R{beta} mutant designs. Variants displaying minimal predicted off-target interactions and enhanced in target contacts are prioritized for structural modelling. Top designs showed outstanding AF3 structural and interfacial quality metrics ipTM and pTM, with averages between cognate pairs of 0.724{+/-}0.05 and 0.770{+/-}0.042, respectively. All in-silico hits showed ipTM <0.5 for non-cognates, indicating a good likelihood of orthogonality. Additionally, putative hits showed high levels of predicted structural fidelity to wild-type (WT) human IL-2/IL-2R{beta} (PDB: 2ERJ), with an average structural root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 0.843{+/-}0.375 [A]. These mutants incorporated 7-26 interfacial mutations derived from multiple interface selection strategies. Altogether, the results support the putative foldability and selective affinity of top-ranking mutants displaying metrics close-to or within experimental reference range. Finally, strengths and limitations are discussed, alongside the experimental implications of coupling a constrained protein design pipeline to the discovery and validation of selective binders based on naturally occurring scaffolds.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.5%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
4
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
5
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
6
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
11
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
17
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
22
ImmunoInformatics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
29
Journal of Computational Chemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%