Back

Continuous Estimation of Achilles Tendon Loading in Rupture Patients Using a Single Boot-Mounted Accelerometer

Godshall, S.; Boakye, L. A.; Halilaj, E.; Humbyrd, C. J.; Baxter, J. R.

2026-03-11 orthopedics
10.64898/2026.03.10.26348070 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAchilles tendon ruptures lead to long-term structural and functional deficits. Prior research that sought to identify optimal rehabilitation techniques was fundamentally limited by the inability to continuously monitor Achilles tendon loading during rehabilitation. Our objective was to develop a data-driven model that predicts per-step peak Achilles tendon loading from only a single, boot-mounted accelerometer. MethodsNineteen patients recovering from an acute Achilles tendon rupture completed in-lab walking trials while wearing an instrumented immobilizing boot. A boot-mounted inertial measurement unit provided acceleration signals used for prediction, while a force-sensing insole provided ground truth tendon-loading data through a validated ankle moment balance. We developed a stance-detection algorithm, as well as a personalized one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) to estimate per-step peak Achilles tendon load. Our training framework incorporated a small patient-specific personalization sample and was evaluated on held-out steps. ResultsThe stance detection algorithm identified stance phases with 99.8% precision and mean timing errors of 27.3 ms for heel strike and 61.9 ms for toe-off. The CNN estimated per-step peak Achilles tendon load with a mean absolute error of 0.14 bodyweights (R2=0.68) across rupture patients. ConclusionContinuous, objective estimation of Achilles tendon loading during early rehabilitation is feasible using a single, boot-mounted accelerometer. Model errors were small (9%) relative to the wide range of tendon loading exhibited during immobilizing boot walking. Our proposed approach enables clinicians to continuously monitor mechanical loading during a previously unobservable rehabilitation period and provides a foundation for personalized rehabilitation guidance after Achilles rupture.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.8%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
4
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.6%
10
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%