Back

Biodiversity Dimensions in Mangroves: Uncovering Interactions and Spatial Drivers in the Sundarbans

Das, B.; Asif, A. A.; Ahmed, S.; Xingyun, H.; Fayeem, H. A. M.; Mostofa, Z. B.; Ema, E. J.; Zaddary, A. M.; Ullah, M. A.; Khan, M. M. H.; Paul, N. K.; Ahmed, I.; Sarker, S. K.

2026-03-11 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.09.710587 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mangroves play a crucial role in supporting global biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, yet how their multidimensional diversity interact and respond under diverse stress conditions remains underexplored. To address this gap, using species, environmental, functional trait and forest structural data collected from the permanent sample plot (PSP) network (110 PSPs) of the worlds largest mangrove ecosystem, the Sundarbans, we answer three key questions: (Q1) How are structural, functional, taxonomic, and phylogenetic diversities interconnected? We hypothesized that these diversity components are positively correlated (H1). (Q2) What are the key environmental stressors and how the diversity components are influenced by multiple stressors? We hypothesized that these stressors negatively affect all diversity components (H2). (Q3) What spatial patterns emerge in the distributions of these diversity components? Here we hypothesized that these diversity components vary across space under changing environmental conditions (H3). Our results show that taxonomic, functional, structural, and phylogenetic diversity have varying degrees of interconnection. While taxonomic and structural diversity are strongly correlated, functional and phylogenetic diversity exhibit more independent patterns, suggesting distinct ecological processes shape each dimension. Salinity, elevation, silt, community structure and downstream-upstream gradient (i.e., upriver position) have strong influences on all the diversity components although the magnitude of the influence varies. GAM results reveal that salinity and siltation act as the primary negative drivers for most dimensions; however, functional richness and divergence show a unique positive response to salinity. Furthermore, we found that community structure and upriver position significantly influence diversity patterns, often in a non-linear fashion. Though taxonomic, structural, and phylogenetic diversity show higher values mainly in the moderate and low saline areas, functional richness shows higher values in high saline areas. Overall, our results provide strong support for all the hypotheses. Our findings highlight the importance of holistic approach integrating taxonomic, structural, functional, and phylogenetic dimensions for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem functions in dynamic mangrove ecosystems and emphasize the need for conservation efforts that target moderate-stress zones to preserve both ecological and evolutionary diversity. HighlightsO_LIExplored the interconnection between four dimensions of biodiversity (taxonomic, structural, functional, and phylogenetic) and how they respond to multiple stressors in the worlds largest mangrove forest. C_LIO_LIHigh salinity and siltation act as the primary environmental stressors that negatively affect overall biodiversity. C_LIO_LIStructural diversity is strongly related to species richness, serving as a key indicator of ecosystem health. C_LIO_LIFunctional and phylogenetic diversity follow independent spatial patterns, promoting the need for multi-dimensional monitoring. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.2%
2
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
3
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
4
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
9
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
18
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%