Back

CESAR: High-Sensitivity Detection of Copy Number Variations in ctDNA Using Segmentation and Anchor Recalibration

Ni, S.; Kan, K.; Wang, L.; Wu, N.; Jiang, X.

2026-03-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.09.710442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDetecting copy number variations (CNVs) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is crucial for the companion diagnosis and resistance monitoring of various solid tumors (e.g., NSCLC, Glioblastoma). However, when tumor-derived DNA fractions are extremely low (often <1%), traditional depth-based methods frequently fail due to non-linear sequencing depth fluctuations and probe-specific capture biases inherent to targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). MethodsWe developed CESAR (CNV Estimation with Segmentation and Anchor Recalibration), a novel computational tool optimized for ultra-sensitive, tumor-only CNV detection in targeted NGS panels. CESAR utilizes Circular Binary Segmentation (CBS) to re-partition target regions based on relative capture efficiency. It then introduces a dynamic "anchor" selection algorithm that identifies a personalized set of genomic segments mirroring the non-linear coverage behavior of each target gene. By minimizing the Coefficient of Variation (CV) through iterative anchor selection, CESAR effectively recalibrates the baseline to suppress technical noise. ResultsValidation using standard DNA reference materials demonstrated that CESAR successfully identified both amplifications (e.g., MET, ERBB2, EGFR) and relative copy number deletions at ultra-low tumor fractions. Notably, CESAR achieved stable detection of focal alterations as subtle as 2.18 copies (a mere 1.09x fold change relative to the diploid baseline), while maintaining zero false positives in control regions. Evaluation across distinct clinical biofluids--36 clinical plasma samples and 41 glioma cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples--identified critical, previously undetected CNV events, including subtle ERBB2 gains and distinct MET deletions. Furthermore, comprehensive benchmarking revealed that CESAR consistently outperformed the widely used CNVkit, particularly in suppressing technical variance and resolving ultra-low-level copy number gains that CNVkit failed to distinguish from background noise. ConclusionsCESAR provides a highly stable and sensitive algorithmic framework for tumor-only CNV calling in liquid biopsies, facilitating precise therapeutic decision-making in precision oncology.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.7%
2
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.1%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.4%
5
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
7
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
18
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%
29
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%