Back

Conversational Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Molecular Characterization of Sezary Syndrome Reveals Distinct Pathway-Level Alterations Compared with Non-Sezary Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Diaz, F. C.; Waldrup, B.; Carranza, F. G.; Manjarrez, S.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.

2026-03-10 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347970 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSezary syndrome (SS) represents an aggressive leukemic variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) with distinct clinical behavior compared with other CTCL subtypes. While prior studies have identified recurrent genomic alterations in CTCL, a systematic pathway-centric comparison between SS and non-SS CTCL remains limited. We applied our conversational artificial intelligence (AI) platform for precision oncology, to accelerate hypothesis generation and integrative interpretation of public genomic data. MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of somatic mutation and clinical data from the Columbia University CTCL cohort available via cBioPortal. Samples were stratified into SS (n=26) and non-SS CTCL (n=17). High-impact coding variants were retained and annotated to curated functional gene groups and signaling pathways relevant to CTCL biology. Pathway-level mutation frequencies were compared using Fishers exact test, with effect sizes summarized by odds ratios. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing. Subtype-specific gene-gene co-mutation patterns were assessed using pairwise association testing and visualized with heatmaps and oncoplots, with our conversational AI agents facilitating interactive exploration and prioritization of results. ResultsOverall TMB did not differ between SS and non-SS CTCL (p=0.83), indicating comparable global mutational burden. Pathway-level analyses revealed enrichment of alterations affecting epigenetic regulators, tumor suppressor and cell-cycle control genes, NFAT signaling, and apoptosis/immune regulation in SS, whereas MAPK and JAK-STAT pathway alterations were relatively more frequent in non-SS CTCL. Co-mutation analysis demonstrated fewer but more focused gene-gene interactions in SS compared with broader co-mutation networks in non-SS CTCL, suggesting divergent evolutionary constraints. Several genes (including ERBB2, WWC1, POSTN) showed borderline subtype-specific enrichment, warranting further validation. ConclusionsConversational AI-enhanced analysis reveals that SS is distinguished from other CTCL subtypes not by higher mutational load, but by qualitative differences in pathway involvement, particularly epigenetic dysregulation, immune escape, and transcriptional control. These findings generate testable hypotheses for downstream validation in patient-level datasets and demonstrate the utility of conversational AI agents as accelerators of translational cancer genomics.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
14
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
20
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
23
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%