Back

Quantitative Dixon-Based PDFF and R2* Estimation and Optimization on MR-Simulation and MR-Linac Devices for the Pelvis and Head and Neck: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 0-2a Study

McCullum, L.; West, N. A.; Shin, K.; Taylor, B. A.; Augustyn, A.; Saifi, O.; Thrower, S.; Wang, J.; Shah, S.; Choi, S.; Anakwenze, C. P.; Fuller, C. D.; Floyd, W.

2026-03-10 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347965 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeThe use of MRI-based fat quantification can be applied to automatically identify red bone marrow which is highly sensitive to radiation and systemic therapies and could be used as an organ-of-interest for adaptive radiation therapy. Currently, the tradeoff of scan time and PDFF/R2* quantification accuracy from the 2-/3-/6-point methods, particularly for the time-constrained MR-Linac, remain unanswered. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility and quantitative performance of quantitative Dixon-based imaging for scanners within the radiation oncology department. Materials and MethodsA 2-/3-/6-point version of the quantitative Dixon sequence was developed and scanned on a 1.5T MR-Simulation, 3T MR-Simulation, and 1.5T MR-Linac scanner for five repetitions using the Calimetrix Model 725 PDFF-R2* phantom as a nominal reference for quantitative PDFF/R2* values. The image geometric distortion as well as the quantitative concordance, Bland-Altman agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility of both the PDFF/R2* values were determined. Each sequence was evaluated in both the pelvis and head and neck across both healthy volunteers and patients. ResultsThe most severe geometric distortion was less than 2 mm except for the 1.5T MR-Linac when using the 2-point Dixon sequence with distortions exceeding 5 mm. The 6-point Dixon sequence showed the highest concordance at above 0.97 across all scanners for both PDFF and R2* followed by the 3-point and 2-point sequence. The 2-point Dixon sequence exhibited significant PDFF biases particularly at the higher R2* values since it did not correct for it during reconstruction. For the Bland-Altman analysis, the 2-point Dixon sequence had the widest 95% limits of agreement followed by the 3-point and 6-point Dixon sequence with the narrowest bands. The goodness-of-fit is generally lowest at higher PDFF values and lower R2* values. Both repeatability and reproducibility were the lowest for the 6-point Dixon sequence. DiscussionThe 6-point quantitative Dixon sequence demonstrated superiority for the chosen evaluation metrics. The results of this work can be used to determine the threshold for true quantitative changes of PDFF/R2* while considering acquisition variabilities, enabling future biomarker studies and clinical trials. Further, this work provides validation for future investigations into quantitative bone marrow characterization. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=81 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26347965v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8b2139org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@322a97org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18a3a46org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f7ef62_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.