Quantitative Dixon-Based PDFF and R2* Estimation and Optimization on MR-Simulation and MR-Linac Devices for the Pelvis and Head and Neck: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 0-2a Study
McCullum, L.; West, N. A.; Shin, K.; Taylor, B. A.; Augustyn, A.; Saifi, O.; Thrower, S.; Wang, J.; Shah, S.; Choi, S.; Anakwenze, C. P.; Fuller, C. D.; Floyd, W.
Show abstract
Background and PurposeThe use of MRI-based fat quantification can be applied to automatically identify red bone marrow which is highly sensitive to radiation and systemic therapies and could be used as an organ-of-interest for adaptive radiation therapy. Currently, the tradeoff of scan time and PDFF/R2* quantification accuracy from the 2-/3-/6-point methods, particularly for the time-constrained MR-Linac, remain unanswered. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility and quantitative performance of quantitative Dixon-based imaging for scanners within the radiation oncology department. Materials and MethodsA 2-/3-/6-point version of the quantitative Dixon sequence was developed and scanned on a 1.5T MR-Simulation, 3T MR-Simulation, and 1.5T MR-Linac scanner for five repetitions using the Calimetrix Model 725 PDFF-R2* phantom as a nominal reference for quantitative PDFF/R2* values. The image geometric distortion as well as the quantitative concordance, Bland-Altman agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility of both the PDFF/R2* values were determined. Each sequence was evaluated in both the pelvis and head and neck across both healthy volunteers and patients. ResultsThe most severe geometric distortion was less than 2 mm except for the 1.5T MR-Linac when using the 2-point Dixon sequence with distortions exceeding 5 mm. The 6-point Dixon sequence showed the highest concordance at above 0.97 across all scanners for both PDFF and R2* followed by the 3-point and 2-point sequence. The 2-point Dixon sequence exhibited significant PDFF biases particularly at the higher R2* values since it did not correct for it during reconstruction. For the Bland-Altman analysis, the 2-point Dixon sequence had the widest 95% limits of agreement followed by the 3-point and 6-point Dixon sequence with the narrowest bands. The goodness-of-fit is generally lowest at higher PDFF values and lower R2* values. Both repeatability and reproducibility were the lowest for the 6-point Dixon sequence. DiscussionThe 6-point quantitative Dixon sequence demonstrated superiority for the chosen evaluation metrics. The results of this work can be used to determine the threshold for true quantitative changes of PDFF/R2* while considering acquisition variabilities, enabling future biomarker studies and clinical trials. Further, this work provides validation for future investigations into quantitative bone marrow characterization. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=81 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26347965v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8b2139org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@322a97org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18a3a46org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f7ef62_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.