Back

Experimental multi-center validation of a radiomics-based photonic quantum precision medicine architecture for lesion-level prediction of anti-PD-1 response in non-small cell lung cancer

Olgiati, S.; Santona, F.; Meloni, D.; Barabino, E.; Rossi, G.; Genova, C.; Grossi, F.; Heidari, N.

2026-03-10 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347939 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevious research has shown that radiomics-based machine learning models are promising precision medicine tools for lesion-level predictions of Anti-PD-1 response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but their clinical implementation remains limited due to poor generalizability and uncertainty about which features capture true biological signals or merely reflect noise. We tested the performance and multi-center validity of a radiomics-based photonic quantum architecture trained on a feature space reduced using clinical knowledge and robust medical statistics. MethodsThis study included 125 patients with 164 advanced NSCLC single lesions from 3 different hospitals (Train, Test 1 and Test 2) treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy as first or second line. All patients underwent a baseline CT scan before the start of the treatment, the lesions were semi-automatically segmented and labeled as "progressive" if their diameter increased by more than 10% and as "non-progressive" if their diameter decreased by 10% or more over the following 6 months. From each CT scan we extracted 851 radiomic features with a METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS) of 86.1% (Excellent Quality Category (Table S1)) of which 183 were identified as reliable based on previous published clinical research. We then trained 1 classical and 3 photonic quantum machine learning models in Train Hospital and tested their performance on unseen external datasets in Test Hospitals 1 & 2. Aiming to explore quantum machine learning as a long-term technology for precision oncology, we utilized an ideal classical simulation of a photonic quantum architecture. This approach assumes perfectly functioning hardware, eliminating confounding physical noise to assess true theoretical performance. Crucially, by adapting the standardized MerLin template, we ensure our results are reproducible, fulfilling an essential requirement for evidence-based clinical research. FindingsWe found that only 2 features out of 851 were both reliable and robustly correlated to the target (p < 0.001). These 2 features were used to train the machine learning models. Across external validation datasets, the LEXGROUPING-6modes quantum architecture explicitly outperformed the classical MLP baseline in Test Hospital 1 (Average Precision 0.755 vs. 0.702) and matched its performance in Test Hospital 2 (0.670). Notably, all photonic quantum architectures successfully exceeded the chance level defined by progressor prevalence (0.622 and 0.462, respectively). InterpretationTo our knowledge, this is the first study that tests the external validity of radiomics-based photonic quantum architectures utilizing an evidence-based, statistically significant reduced feature space. Crucially, demonstrating that a quantum architecture can outperform or match an optimized classical baseline represents a significant milestone. These findings validate the theoretical potential of quantum models to capture complex biological signals, supporting their future role as clinical decision support systems for NSCLC immunotherapy as both dedicated quantum algorithms evolve and physical hardware matures. Furthermore, we found supporting evidence that heavily reducing the feature space can improve generalizability without compromising performance. Future research is required to assess scalability to other clinical centers and validate these models on physical photonic quantum processors under realistic hardware noise conditions.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
4
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
5
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
10
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
21
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
25
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
29
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%