Back

AI-Powered Pipeline for Annotating Echocardiography Notes and Prognostic Variable Analysis in Critical Care

Xu, S.; Ma, T.; Duan, C.; IP, A.; Tam, C.; LEUNG, Y.; Yang, J.; SIN, S.; CHEUNG, E.; Yiu, K.-H.; Yeung, P.

2026-03-10 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347835 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEchocardiography (echo) notes contain valuable prognostic information for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, their unstructured format and the presence of sensitive patient information present challenges for large-scale, automated analysis. There is a need for secure and efficient methods to extract and utilize echo data to enhance ICU outcome prediction. MethodsWe developed an AI-powered, privacy-preserving pipeline that leverages advanced natural language processing and pattern matching to annotate echo notes locally, ensuring comprehensive masking of personally identifiable information. This pipeline was applied to patient data from a mixed medical surgical ICU in a tertiary referral hospital. Key variables were extracted from echo notes and integrated with clinical and laboratory data to predict ICU mortality. A LightGBM machine learning model--robust to missing values--was trained using both routine and echo-derived structured clinical features. Its predictive performance was compared to that of the APACHE IV score. ResultsCompared with the reference standard derived from manual annotation by echocardiography specialist, automated annotation of echo notes achieved 98.85% data accuracy with a false positive rate of 0.31%. Several echo-derived variables, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), mitral regurgitation (MR), and aortic regurgitation (AR), were strongly associated with ICU mortality. Incorporating echo-derived variables improved the accuracy in prediction of ICU mortality, with the LightGBM model achieving an AUC of 0.902 compared to 0.861 for APACHE IV score. ConclusionOur locally deployable AI pipeline enables secure and automated extraction of prognostic information from echo notes, substantially enhancing ICU mortality prediction. The inclusion of echo-derived variables significantly improved predictive accuracy, underscoring the potential but currently underutilized value of unstructured notes. This approach paves the way for scalable, privacy-preserving decision support tools in critical care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
2
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
4
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.0%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.2%
18
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%