Back

Exploring per-base quality scores as a surrogate marker of cell-free DNA fragmentome

Volkov, H. H. V.; Raitses-Gurevich, M.; Grad, M.; Shlayem, R.; Leibowitz, D.; Rubinek, T.; Golan, T.; Shomron, N.

2026-03-10 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.03.08.710357 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Per-base quality scores are widely treated as technical metadata in next-generation sequencing. Here, we show that in rigorously controlled whole-genome sequencing of cell-free DNA, quality profiles may encode fragmentomic signals that enable classification of cancer samples against matched controls. Analyzing four independent batches (23 cancer samples: pancreatic and breast; 22 matched controls) sequenced in a within-lane regime and further normalized per flow-cell tile to reduce technical confounders, we demonstrate through unsupervised analysis that boundary-enriched dynamics captured in these quality scores consistently separate cancer from control samples. A leave-one-batch-out classifier trained on quality-derived scores achieved a pooled area under the curve of 0.81. Furthermore, we show that the quality-derived metric correlates with short-fragment enrichment and tumor-associated 5-end motifs, performing comparably to established, motif-based orthogonal methods. These results provide initial evidence that quality scores could serve as a low-cost, alignment-free biomarker for cfDNA-based cancer detection.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.