Back

Functional Dysconnectivity of White Matter Networks is Associated with Clinical Impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder

wu, s.; Huang, M.; Huang, D.; Lin-Li, Z.-Q.; Guo, S.-X.

2026-03-10 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.08.26347903 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStructural white matter (WM) alterations are recognized in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), yet the functional connectivity (FC) of WM networks and its clinical significance remain largely under-explored. MethodsThis study aimed to investigate aberrant FC patterns within intra-WM (WM-WM) and WM-gray matter (WM-GM) networks in a large ASD cohort. Resting-state fMRI data from 272 ASD individuals and 368 typical controls (TC) from the ABIDE-II dataset were analyzed. We constructed WM-WM and WM-GM FC networks using Pearson correlations between atlas-defined regions, applied ComBat harmonization, and employed Network-Based Statistics (NBS) to identify group differences. Associations with clinical symptoms were assessed using Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) scores, and a CatBoost algorithm was used for diagnostic classification based on connectivity features. ResultsNBS analyses revealed significantly increased connectivity in ASD for 116 WM-WM pairs and 58 WM-GM pairs (P<0.05, FWER-corrected). Critically, the strength of these aberrant WM-WM functional connections exhibited a significant negative correlation with SRS total scores (r = -0.22, P < 0.001), whereas WM-GM connectivity showed no such significant association. The hybrid CatBoost classifier, integrating both WM-WM and WM-GM features, achieved moderate diagnostic discrimination (AUC = 0.669 {+/-} 0.040). ConclusionThese results offer novel insights into the aberrant functional architecture of WM-related networks in ASD, particularly linking intra-WM dysconnectivity to symptom severity, thereby enhancing our understanding of the neural substrates underlying social-communicative deficits.

Published in International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.