Patterns of depression prevalence and antidepressant use in South Africa, 2002-2024: a system dynamics modelling perspective
Johnson, L. F.; Giovenco, D.; Eyal, K.; Craig, A.; Petersen, I.; Tlali, M.; Levitt, N. S.; Bachmann, M.; Haas, A. D.; Fairall, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundDepression is estimated to be the leading cause of disability in South Africa, yet data on depression prevalence and antidepressant use are inconsistent and fragmentary. We present a system dynamics modelling approach to integrate these data and assess trends and inequalities in depression prevalence and treatment access. MethodsWe developed a deterministic model of the South African population aged 15 and older, stratified by age, sex, HIV status/stage and susceptibility to depression. Individual transitions between depressed/healthy and treated/untreated states were simulated over time, from 1985. The model was calibrated to depression prevalence data from nine nationally representative household surveys (2002-2024) and ten smaller studies reporting prevalence of antidepressant use, using a Bayesian approach. ResultsThe model estimated a slight decline in depression point prevalence over time, from 5.1% (95% CI: 4.5-5.6%) in 2002 to 4.5% (95% CI: 4.0-5.0%) in 2024, although with a transient rise in depression prevalence during the COVID-19 period. In 2024, depression prevalence was higher in women (5.3%, 95% CI: 4.7-5.9%) than men (3.6%, 95% CI: 3.2-4.0%), and highest at ages 60 and older. The lifetime prevalence of depression was 70.6% (95% CI: 67.8-73.6); alternative model settings with a more concentrated distribution of depression risk were inconsistent with longitudinal data. The proportion of adults using antidepressants increased from 1.0% (95% CI: 0.8-1.2%) in 2008 to 2.8% (95% CI: 2.2-3.4%) in 2024. In 2024, antidepressant use was 11.0% (95% CI: 8.8-13.5%) in the private sector, compared to only 0.9% (95% CI: 0.7-1.1%) in the rest of the population, and the ratio of new antidepressant initiations to new cases of depression was 0.12 nationally. ConclusionThe prevalence of depression in South Africa has been relatively stable over the last two decades. Although antidepressant use has increased, overall use remains low, and substantial inequality remains in access to treatment in the public and private health sectors.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Cost-Effectiveness Of Depression Screening For The General Adult Population 94%
- Antidepressant and mental health care utilization in pregnant women with depression and/or anxiety: an interrupted time-series analysis 92%
- Life-years lost associated with mental illness: a cohort study of beneficiaries of a South African medical insurance scheme 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing the causal role of intimate partner violence and abuse on depressive symptoms in young adults: a population-based cohort study 91%
- Parental Income Gradients in Adult Health: A National Cohort Study 90%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality in the second and third waves of the pandemic in England during the vaccine roll-out: a retrospective, population-based cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of integrated care for older adults with depression and hypertension in rural China: a cluster randomized controlled trial 90%
- Risk of common psychiatric disorders, suicidal behaviours and premature mortality following violent victimisation: A matched cohort and sibling-comparison study of 127,628 people who experienced violence in Finland and Sweden 90%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Risks and Benefits of Providing HIV Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 91%
- On the treatment effect heterogeneity of antidepressants in major depression. A Bayesian meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Antidepressant Prescribing with a focus on people with learning disability and autism: An interrupted time-series analysis in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP 93%
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 93%
- Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.