Back

Direct detection and quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from clinical samples by high-resolution melt qPCR

Babu, A. S.; Ellappan, K.; Yadav, P.; Ponnusamy, P.; Govindaraj, V.; Kumar, S. V.; Pandey, A.; Joseph, N. M.; Verma, R.

2026-03-09 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.03.07.26347851 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEstimating bacterial load in clinical samples has important applications in tuberculosis (TB) management, including assessment of disease severity, treatment response, and baseline genome copies required for sequencing. However, rapid and affordable tools for quantifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) remain limited. MethodsWe developed a high-resolution melt (HRM) based quantitative PCR assay using molecular beacon chemistry targeting the single-copy RD9 region of M. tuberculosis. Analytical performance was assessed using 10-fold serial dilutions of H37Rv DNA. Clinical validation included DNA from 100 M. tuberculosis culture isolates and 40 sputum samples from Xpert MTB/RIF- and culture-positive pulmonary TB patients. To evaluate specificity, we tested 30 non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) culture isolates from patients infected with Mycobacterium abscessus (n=25) and Mycobacterium fortuitum (n=5) and DNA from saliva samples of 10 healthy controls. ResultsThe HRM-qPCR assay showed a linear dynamic range from 101 to 106 genome copies per reaction, with a lower limit of detection of 10 copies. Standardized melt-curve analysis yielded a single target-specific peak at 73.7{+/-}0.12{degrees}C across dilutions, confirming specific amplification. Sensitivity for M. tuberculosis detection was 100% in culture isolates and 95.0% (38/40) in sputum, with no false positives among M. tuberculosis-negative controls. Assay specificity was 100% in both culture isolates and sputum, with no additional melt peaks. We did not observe any peaks indicative of non-specific binding in NTMs. Amplification was observed in two NTM samples whose Tm matched M. tuberculosis RD9 (median M. tuberculosis copies=678.5), suggesting possible co-infection or contamination. No amplification or specific melt peaks were observed in saliva samples, indicating high probe specificity. ConclusionsMolecular beacon-based HRM-qPCR assay enables rapid, highly specific quantification of M. tuberculosis genome copies in clinical samples and has potential utility for treatment monitoring, triaging specimens for sequencing, and assessing transmission risk in high-burden settings.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.6%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
5
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
9
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
11
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.5%
30
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%