A multicenter prospective validation cohort does not confirm the diagnostic yield of FDG PET/CT imaging in kidney allograft subclinical rejection
Lovinfosse, P.; Bouquegneau, A.; Massart, A.; Pipeleers, L.; Bonvoisin, C.; Carp, L.; Everaert, H.; Jadoul, A.; Dendooven, A.; Geers, C.; Grosch, S.; Erpicum, P.; Hellemans, R.; Seidel, L.; Weekers, L.; Hustinx, R.; Jouret, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundSubclinical kidney allograft acute rejection (SCR) corresponds to "the unexpected histological evidence of acute rejection in a stable patient". The diagnosis of SCR relies on surveillance biopsy. Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) after injection of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) has been proposed as a non-invasive screening approach. In the present multicenter prospective study, we assess the diagnostic yield [18F]FDGPET/CT to rule out SCR in stable KTR at 3 months post KTx. MethodsFrom 01/2021 to 03/2025, we prospectively combined surveillance biopsy and [18F]FDGPET/CT at [~]3 months post transplantation in adult kidney transplant recipients from 4 independent imaging centers. The mean standardized uptake value (mSUV) was measured in kidney cortex and referenced as a ratio to psoas muscle mSUV (mSUVR). ResultsOur multicentric 185-patient cohort was categorized upon Banff-2022: normal (n=158); borderline (n=18); SCR (n=9, including 6 T-cell-mediated rejection and 3 microvascular inflammation). No significant correlation was observed between the mSUVR and ti score (R=0.032, p-value=0.67). The mSUVR reached 2.33 [1.97-2.93], 2.71 [2.50-3.33] and 2.42 [2.27-3.14] in normal, borderline and SCR groups, respectively. In multivariate models stratified by center, the risk of non-normal histology (n=27, including borderline and SCR) increased with donor age (OR=1.05 [1.01-1.1], p=0.02) but not with the mSUVR (OR=4.11 [0.91-18.48], p=0.07). The risk of biopsy-proven SCR (n=9) was not significantly associated with mSUVR. ConclusionsThe mSUVR of [18F]FDG PET/CT does not reliably rule out SCR on surveillance biopsy.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning-supported interpretation of kidney graft elementary lesions in combination with clinical data 98%
- Deceased donor kidney degradomics indicates cytoskeletal proteolytic alterations impacting post-transplant function 95%
- Improving diagnostic performance of kidney allograft rejection with a model combining relative fraction and absolute copies of donor-derived cell-free DNA - results from five independent cohorts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- FOXP3 mRNA profile prognostic of T cell mediated rejection and human kidney allograft survival 95%
- Tixagevimab-cilgavimab as an early treatment for COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients 94%
- Perfusate metabolomics content and tubular transporters expression during kidney graft preservation by hypothermic machine perfusion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning identifies pathological abnormalities predictive of graft loss in kidney transplant biopsies 96%
- SARS-CoV-2-specific Humoral Immune Responses after A Single dose of Inactivated Whole-virus SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients: An Initial Report 92%
- Digital Spatial Profiling of Collapsing Glomerulopathy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mismatches in gene deletions and kidney-related proteins are novel histocompatibility factors in kidney transplantation 96%
- Changing of therapeutic trends between the 1st and 2nd wave did not reduce COVID-19 related mortality of renal transplant recipients: a national registry study 94%
- Urine Test Predicts Kidney Injury and Death in COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of competing risks in kidney allograft failure prediction 95%
- Harnessing Expressed Single Nucleotide Variation and Single Cell RNA Sequencing to Define Immune Cell Chimerism in the Rejecting Kidney Transplant 93%
- Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies response of renal lymphatic endothelial cells to acute kidney injury 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.