Back

A multicenter prospective validation cohort does not confirm the diagnostic yield of FDG PET/CT imaging in kidney allograft subclinical rejection

Lovinfosse, P.; Bouquegneau, A.; Massart, A.; Pipeleers, L.; Bonvoisin, C.; Carp, L.; Everaert, H.; Jadoul, A.; Dendooven, A.; Geers, C.; Grosch, S.; Erpicum, P.; Hellemans, R.; Seidel, L.; Weekers, L.; Hustinx, R.; Jouret, F.

2026-03-09 transplantation
10.64898/2026.03.07.26347838 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSubclinical kidney allograft acute rejection (SCR) corresponds to "the unexpected histological evidence of acute rejection in a stable patient". The diagnosis of SCR relies on surveillance biopsy. Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) after injection of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) has been proposed as a non-invasive screening approach. In the present multicenter prospective study, we assess the diagnostic yield [18F]FDGPET/CT to rule out SCR in stable KTR at 3 months post KTx. MethodsFrom 01/2021 to 03/2025, we prospectively combined surveillance biopsy and [18F]FDGPET/CT at [~]3 months post transplantation in adult kidney transplant recipients from 4 independent imaging centers. The mean standardized uptake value (mSUV) was measured in kidney cortex and referenced as a ratio to psoas muscle mSUV (mSUVR). ResultsOur multicentric 185-patient cohort was categorized upon Banff-2022: normal (n=158); borderline (n=18); SCR (n=9, including 6 T-cell-mediated rejection and 3 microvascular inflammation). No significant correlation was observed between the mSUVR and ti score (R=0.032, p-value=0.67). The mSUVR reached 2.33 [1.97-2.93], 2.71 [2.50-3.33] and 2.42 [2.27-3.14] in normal, borderline and SCR groups, respectively. In multivariate models stratified by center, the risk of non-normal histology (n=27, including borderline and SCR) increased with donor age (OR=1.05 [1.01-1.1], p=0.02) but not with the mSUVR (OR=4.11 [0.91-18.48], p=0.07). The risk of biopsy-proven SCR (n=9) was not significantly associated with mSUVR. ConclusionsThe mSUVR of [18F]FDG PET/CT does not reliably rule out SCR on surveillance biopsy.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.0%
2
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
5
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
7
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
12
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%