Back

Cost Impact of Chronic Care Management Services in a Large Multi-Specialty Practice: A Pragmatic Outcomes Study

Clark, B. W.; Webster, J.; Chatterjee, S.; Finch, M. D.

2026-03-10 health policy
10.64898/2026.03.07.26347834 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic Care Management (CCM) services represent an underutilized Medicare benefit with potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve care coordination for beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions. ObjectiveTo evaluate the real-world impact of CCM services on healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs in a large multi-specialty outpatient practice. DesignPragmatic retrospective cohort study comparing Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in CCM services versus eligible non-enrolled beneficiaries. SettingLarge multi-specialty outpatient clinic in Alabama with 77 physicians across more than 20 specialties. ParticipantsTreatment group (n=6,093) consisted of patients continuously enrolled in CCM services between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Comparison group (n=30,432) included eligible patients who were not enrolled in CCM services during the same period. InterventionStructured CCM program delivered by licensed practical nurses (LPNs) providing monthly telephone or video encounters focused on care plan implementation, medication reconciliation, care coordination, preventive health maintenance, and social determinants of health. Main MeasuresPer-member-per-year (PMPM) paid amounts and patient out-of-pocket expenditures, adjusted for age and sex differences. ResultsThe CCM treatment group demonstrated 13.6% lower unadjusted healthcare costs compared to the comparison group ($96 vs. $110 PMPM). After adjusting for demographic differences, cost savings increased to 17.1% ($75 vs. $89 PMPM). Patient out-of-pocket expenses were 16% lower in the treatment group ($29 vs. $34 PMPM). These savings were achieved despite the treatment group being 2% older on average and including 10% more female beneficiaries--both factors typically associated with higher healthcare costs. ConclusionsImplementation of structured CCM services in a real-world multi-specialty practice setting is associated with reductions in both total healthcare expenditures and patient out-of-pocket costs. These findings support CCM as a practical, cost-effective approach to chronic disease management that benefits patients.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.5%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.2%
3
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
5
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
12
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
24
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%