Predicting Graduation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Machine Learning Analysis Across Diverse High School Curricula
Mohamadeya, J.; Khamis, A.; Alsuwaidi, L.; Azar, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe United Arab Emirates (UAE) is characterised by a diverse educational landscape, where students enter medical school from various high school curricula. Understanding how these varied academic backgrounds influence medical students academic performance is essential. The transition to medical school is a critical phase, with graduation outcomes carrying important implications for both students and institutions. Identifying early predictors of success is crucial to improving student support and academic outcomes in undergraduate medical education. AimThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of high school curriculum type on graduation outcomes in an undergraduate medical education program. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on undergraduate medical students enrolled at Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health, Dubai, UAE, from its inception in 2016 through 2024. The data were accessed for this research on 04/06/2024. The study employed machine learning methods, including Bayesian Networks (BN), Neural Networks (NN), and Random Forests (RF), to evaluate the predictive power of high school curriculum type and other academic variables for graduation success. ResultsThe study included 661 undergraduate medical students, predominantly female, 76.7% (n=507). Students represented 11 high school curricula, with the American (48.1%) and British (22.7%) systems being the most common. Among 122 students eligible to graduate, the Bayesian Network model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.94). The cumulative GPA was the most influential predictor. The model correctly identified 269 out of 494 students (54.5%) as likely to graduate. ConclusionThe type of high school curriculum alone is not a strong predictor of graduation success. Academic performance during medical school and providing targeted support for students from diverse educational backgrounds are more robust predictors. Advanced predictive modelling holds promise for educational research and institutional policy development.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 95%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 95%
- Factors and mediators impacting the number of undergraduate research mentees at a research-intensive Hispanic-serving institution 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An AI-based approach to predict delivery outcome based on measurable factors of pregnant mothers 91%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 91%
- Inferring Gender from First Names: Comparing the Accuracy of Genderize, Gender API, and the gender R Package on Authors of Diverse Nationality 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- For-Profit Growth and Academic Decline: A Retrospective Nationwide Assessment of Brazilian Medical Schools 95%
- Performance of o1 pro and GPT-4 in self-assessment questions for nephrology board renewal 90%
- Disruption of Normal Saline Supply Chain due to Natural Disaster: an analysis of the impact of normal saline shortage on anesthesia practice in a large hospital system and models towards resiliency 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.