In vivo de-amplification of a multi-resistance pseudo-compound transposon in Escherichia coli
Pulmones, R.; Moyo, S. J.; Tesfay, B.; Gidabayda, J.; Justine, M.; Hoyland Lohr, I.; Blomberg, B.; Wagstaff, S. P.; Langeland, N.; Roberts, A. P.
Show abstract
The rapid expansion of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Gram-negative pathogens presents a major clinical challenge, particularly in vulnerable populations such as infants. The dissemination of resistance is often mediated by mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that can mobilise antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) both within and between genomes. The insertion sequence (IS) IS26, is a MGE with the ability to replicate itself and associated ARGs, create translocatable units (TU), and produce tandem arrays of ARGs. Here we present the 18-week in vivo evolution of a community-acquired multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli colonising an infant gut, characterised by a de-amplification of an IS26-mediated tandem array of ARGs. The hybrid-assembled ancestral and descendant strain genomes show an evolutionary rate of 10.22 SNPs per genome per year. Independent analysis of the hybrid genome assembly, and of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Illumina read-mapping support the existence of at least five copies of a TU (Tn3-like(tnpA)-tetR-tetA-yedA-{Delta}Tn1721(tnpA) -IS26-aac(6)-Ib-cr-blaOXA-1-{Delta}catB3-IS26) in the ancestor and only one in the descendant. Despite de-amplification, no change in fitness (p = 0.275) and piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility (TZP) was observed. In contrast, gentamicin susceptibility increased, in the absence of known associated mutations. This study provides insight into IS26-mobility dynamics in vivo and their implications for AMR, within the rapidly changing environment of the neonatal gut.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diverse Genetic Determinants of Nitrofurantoin Resistance in UK Escherichia coli 98%
- Complete genome assembly of clinical multidrug resistant Bacteroides fragilis isolates enables comprehensive identification of antimicrobial resistance genes and plasmids 97%
- Genomic surveillance of Escherichia coli ST131 identifies local expansion and serial replacement of subclones 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Determinants Underlying the Progressive Phenotype of Beta-lactam/Beta-lactamase Inhibitor Resistance in Escherichia coli 96%
- Global dissemination of tet(X3) and tet(X6) among livestock-associated Acinetobacter is sporadically mediated by highly diverse plasmidomes 96%
- Species-wide phylogenomics of the Staphylococcus aureus agr operon reveals convergent evolution of frameshift mutations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inter-phylum circulation of a beta-lactamase - encoding gene: a rare but observable event 96%
- Novel quinolone resistance determinant, qepA8, in Shigella flexneri isolated in the United States, 2016 96%
- Molecular epidemiology of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from Southeast Queensland, Australia 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergence of optrA-mediated linezolid resistance in multiple lineages and plasmids of Enterococcus faecalis revealed by long read sequencing 95%
- Variations in carbapenem resistance associated with the VIM-1 metallo-β-lactamase across the Enterobacterales 95%
- A novel hemA mutation is responsible for small colony variant phenotype in Escherichia coli. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolution of VIM-1 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from a hospital outbreak reveals the genetic bases of the loss of the urease-positive identification character 97%
- Specificities and commonalities of carbapenemase producing Escherichia coli isolated in France from 2012 to 2015. 96%
- Circulation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates expressing CS23 from the environment to clinical settings 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.