Population differences in wearable device wear time: Rescuing data to address biases and advance health equity

Wearable devices present transformative opportunities for personalized healthcare through continuous monitoring of digital biomarkers; however, individual variations in device wear time could mask or otherwise impact signal identification. Despite the widespread adoption of wearable devices in research, no comprehensive framework exists for understanding how wear time varies across populations or for addressing wear time-related biases in analysis. Using Fitbit data from 11,901 participants in the All of Us Research Program, we conducted the first large-scale systematic assessment of wearable device wear time across demographics, social determinants of health, lifestyle factors, mental health symptoms, and disease. Our findings revealed that wear time was higher among males and increased with age, income, and education, but decreased with depressive, anxiety, and anhedonia symptoms, with reductions more pronounced following clinical diagnoses compared to symptom-based classifications. Individuals with chronic conditions displayed differential levels of wear time compared to healthy controls. Critically, we demonstrate that the widely used [≥]10-hour daily compliance threshold, while appropriate for some research contexts, can disproportionately exclude days of data from disease populations: among individuals with major depressive disorder, 74.4% of data days were excluded compared to 20.9% for controls. We propose a flexible methodological framework including standard compliance thresholds, wear time covariate adjustment, metric normalization, propensity score matching, and adaptive thresholds that can be applied individually or in combination to optimize wearable data retention across diverse research contexts. These findings establish wear time as a critical methodological consideration for wearable device research and provide guidance for advancing equitable and rigorous digital health analytics.