Back

Physiology-Informed Digital Twin-AI Framework Predicts Pacing Therapy Response in HFpEF

Gu, F.; Infeld, M.; Schenk, N. A.; Wan, H.; Krishnan, M. J.; Cyr, J. A.; Sturgess, V. E.; Wittrup, E.; Jezek, F.; Carlson, B. E.; van Loon, T.; Hua, X.; Tang, Y.; Najarian, K.; Hummel, S. L.; Lumens, J.; Meyer, M.; Beard, D. A.

2026-03-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.06.26347199 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibits profound phenotypic heterogeneity, which likely contributes to variable therapeutic response. We developed a physiology-informed digital twin-AI framework to predict individual hemodynamic and myocardial energetic responses to accelerated atrial pacing and tested whether simulated physiologic response corresponds to responders in the myPACE randomized clinical trial. MethodsPatient-specific digital twins were constructed for 146 HFpEF patients and used to train a variational autoencoder that generated a virtual HFpEF population (n = 25,000). The model simulated pacing-induced changes in left atrial pressure (LAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), cardiac output (CO), and cardiac efficiency (CE; derived from myocardial oxygen-demand estimates). These simulations served as labels to train classifiers based on clinical variables available in myPACE, allowing us to examine associations with clinical end points and test a hypothesized relationship between CE and treatment response. ResultsSimulations revealed heterogeneous physiological responses, with 95.6% of virtual patients showing reduced LAP, 47.0% an SBP reduction greater than 8.5 mmHg, 93.8% increased CO, and 36.1% improved CE. Classifiers reproduced these patterns with high fidelity. In the myPACE trial, patients classified as having CE improvement or a larger SBP reduction experienced significantly greater 1-month improvements in quality-of-life scores and larger NT-proBNP reductions. ConclusionsA physiology-informed digital twin-AI framework can predict hemodynamic and energetic responses corresponding to clinical benefit in HFpEF patients receiving accelerated atrial pacing. CE improvement functioned as a mechanistic indicator, while SBP reduction served as an accessible clinical correlate, offering mechanistically grounded guidance for patient-specific pacing and motivating prospective validation. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=122 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26347199v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (63K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4a550eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@163b85org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19db16dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1eb6cf5_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
9
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.8%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%