Back

Quadriceps Strength And Knee Abduction Moment During Landing In Adolescent Athletes

Johnson, L. R.; Bond, C. W.; Noonan, B. C.

2026-03-06 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.03.06.26347192 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundQuadriceps weakness may reduce sagittal plane shock absorption during landing, shifting load toward the frontal plane and increasing knee abduction moment (KAM), a biomechanical risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between isokinetic quadriceps strength and peak KAM during drop vertical jump landing in adolescent athletes. Study DesignSecondary analysis of previously collected data. MethodsHealthy adolescent athletes completed quadriceps strength testing using an isokinetic dynamometer and a biomechanical assessment during a drop vertical jump task. Quadriceps strength was quantified as peak concentric torque and the peak external KAM was calculated during the landing phase on the dominant limb. Both strength and KAM were normalized to body mass. Linear regression was used to examine the association between normalized quadriceps strength and peak external KAM on the dominant limb. ResultsThe association between quadriceps strength and peak normalized KAM on the dominant limb was not statistically significant ({beta} = -0.053 (95% CI [-0.137 to 0.030]), F(1,119) = 1.62, R2 = 0.013, p = 0.206). Quadriceps strength explained only 1.3% of the variance in peak KAM, indicating a negligible association between these variables in this cohort. DiscussionQuadriceps strength was not associated with peak normalized KAM during landing, suggesting that frontal-plane knee loading during a drop vertical jump is not meaningfully explained by maximal concentric quadriceps strength alone. KAM appears to be driven more by multi-joint movement strategy and neuromuscular coordination than by the capacity of a single muscle group.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.4%
2
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
4
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%