Back

Translating a novel wildfire smoke exposure chamber system from lab-based experiments to community-engaged activities

Liu, L.; Huang, S. C.-H.; Hirata, A.; Jones, I.; Liu, N.; Shirai, J.; Zuidema, C.; Austin, E.; Seto, E.

2026-03-09 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.03.06.26346761 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wildfire smoke (WFS) events are an important public health concern for communities in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Previous studies of portable air cleaners, including high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration and do-it-yourself (DIY) box fan filters built with MERV 13-rated filters, have indicated that their use in residential settings may be an effective way to reduce indoor exposures to fine particulate matter during WFS episodes. The lower-cost, easy to build instructions and availability of materials of DIY box fan filters have made their distribution by both public health agencies and community groups an attractive approach to improve community preparedness. Here, we describe a low-cost, easy-to-assemble, portable exposure chamber system that can be used to support a variety of community-engaged demonstrations of WFS removal efficiency as well as provide a mechanism to estimate the efficiency of filtration systems in a controlled environment. We conducted experiments using the portable chamber to assess the clean air delivery rate (CADR) of a MERV 13-rated DIY box fan filter, which was found to be 92.2 and 145.2 cfm at low and high fan speeds, respectively. In addition to using the chamber system to evaluate the CADR of DIY box fan filters, we also provide a case-study example, working with a tribal community in Central Washington, who used the tent system for a live demonstration of a DIY box fan filter experiment during their community gathering to promote WFS and air quality intervention knowledge and distribution of box fan filters.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
11
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
COVID
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%