Back

A 6-Item Diagnostic Screener for Childbirth-Related PTSD

Bartal, A.; Allouche-Kam, H.; Elhasid Felsenstein, T.; Dassopoulos, E. C.; Lee, M.; Edlow, A. G.; Orr, S. P.; Dekel, S.

2026-03-06 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.03.05.26347629 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivePosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after a traumatic birth is a serious but overlooked maternal morbidity, affecting [~]20% of women following medically complicated deliveries. PTSD can undermine maternal caregiving. Rapid screening tools suited to busy obstetric settings are lacking. We developed and evaluated a brief screener, derived from the 20-item PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), to identify PTSD related to childbirth. Study DesignWe enrolled 107 women with traumatic childbirth. Participants completed the PCL-5 and the gold-standard clinician diagnostic interview for PTSD (CAPS-5); depression was measured with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Bootstrap resampling with LASSO regression identified PCL-5 items most associated with PTSD. Firth logistic regression models estimated diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and Youdens J statistic determined performance and optimal cut-off. ResultsA six-item version of the PCL-5 (PCL-5 R6), statistically derived from the full scale, showed excellent discrimination for PTSD compared with clinician evaluation (AUC = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.89-1.00). A cut-off score of 7 yielded high sensitivity (0.96) and good specificity (0.83), with an overall diagnostic efficiency of 0.86, detecting most PTSD cases while minimizing false positives. The PCL-5 R6 correlated moderately with the EPDS (rho = 0.53), showing that a depression screen alone cannot reliably detect PTSD. ConclusionsA short, 6-item PCL-5 provides a valid, efficient tool for detecting childbirth PTSD. Its brevity and accuracy make it practical for integration into routine postpartum care, enabling timely mental health screening.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.