Back

Patient-derived organoids from malignant pleural effusion to explore for alternative therapies in thoracic tumors

Ferreiro-Miguens, R.; Diez-Grandio, I.; Soto-Feijoo, R.; Ferreiro, L.; Garcia, J.; Otero-Alen, M.; Abdulkader, I.; Bernandez, B.; Dominguez, E.; Abal, M.; Leon-Mateos, L.

2026-03-06 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.04.709498 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Thoracic malignancies, including lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), remain associated with poor prognosis and limited durable therapeutic responses in advanced stages. Although targeted therapies and immunotherapy have improved outcomes in selected patients, systemic chemotherapy continues to play a central role in routine clinical practice. However, treatment response is highly heterogeneous, and reliable predictive biomarkers of chemotherapy sensitivity are lacking. Both ADC and MPM frequently involve the pleural cavity and are commonly associated with malignant pleural effusion (MPE), which contributes to symptoms such as dyspnea and chest pain and requires therapeutic drainage. Importantly, MPE represents a clinically accessible source of viable tumor cells obtained through minimally invasive procedures. In this study, we established patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from malignant pleural effusion samples obtained from five patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and, as an exploratory extension, from one patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Organoids were characterized by immunohistochemistry and subjected to systematic chemotherapy drug screening. Inter-model variability in treatment response was assessed, and selected drug sensitivities were further validated through dose-response assays. Pleural effusion-derived organoids successfully recapitulated tumor-specific phenotypic features and revealed marked heterogeneity in chemotherapy sensitivity across models. Secondary validation confirmed the reproducibility of selected responses. Our findings support the feasibility of generating functional organoid models from malignant pleural effusions and highlight their potential as translational platforms for individualized chemotherapy profiling in advanced thoracic malignancies.

Matching journals

The top 18 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
19
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
22
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
23
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
24
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
25
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
26
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
27
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
28
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
29
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
30
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%