Back

Helmet Use Among E-Bike, Pedal Bike, and E-Scooter Riders in Canberra: A Cross-sectional Survey Study (Phase 4)

Silburn, A.

2026-03-05 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.04.26347651 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHelmet use is a proven safety measure that reduces the risk of head injury among cyclists and e-scooter riders. Despite legal requirements for pedal bikes and e-bikes in Australia, compliance varies, particularly among users of electric vehicles. The growing popularity of e-bikes and e-scooters in urban areas presents new public health challenges, yet observational data on helmet use, behavioural determinants, and the effectiveness of safety interventions remain limited. AimPhase 4 of the Helmet Use in Canberra study aims to identify demographic and behavioural predictors of unsafe riding and to explore perceived barriers and facilitators to helmet use, including compliance with existing regulations. MethodsA cross-sectional survey will be administered to Canberra residents aged 18 years or older, both online and in-person. The survey will assess attitudes toward helmet use, perceptions of head injury risk, and the deterrent effect of fines. Data will capture demographic characteristics, vehicle type, riding behaviours under varying conditions, and opinions regarding mandatory helmet laws and signage interventions. Survey responses will be de-identified, securely stored, and analysed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression to evaluate factors influencing compliance. Survey findings will be triangulated with observational and hospital data from earlier study phases. Expected ResultsThe survey is anticipated to provide insights into public attitudes toward helmet use, the perceived effectiveness of fines as behavioural deterrents, and the acceptability of policy interventions. These findings will inform evidence-based strategies to improve helmet compliance and reduce head injuries among urban riders. Trial RegistrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) [ACTRN12626000245392].

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
27.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
4
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
6
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
7
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
11
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
12
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.5%
27
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%