Back

Geographic variation in loss to follow-up from HIV care in Tanzania and its association with pharmacy refill adherence in routine programme data

Lugoba, M. D.; Sangeda, R. Z.; De Vrieze, L.; Mushi, H.; Mutagonda, R. F.; Mwakyomo, J.; Sambu, V.; Njau, P.

2026-03-05 hiv aids
10.64898/2026.03.04.26347648 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSustained retention in HIV care is essential for achieving durable viral suppression and controlling the HIV epidemic. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) remains a persistent challenge in sub-Saharan Africa and shows substantial geographic variation. However, nationally representative analyses of routine monitoring data remain limited. Pharmacy refill data provide a scalable and objective approach for identifying individuals at risk of disengaging from care. We assessed the magnitude, spatial distribution, and predictors of LTFU among people living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) across 26 mainland regions of Tanzania. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using routinely collected program data from the National Care and Treatment Clinic (CTC-2) database of PLHIV receiving ART in Tanzania between 2017 and 2021. LTFU was defined as no recorded clinic visit for [&ge;]180 days after the last scheduled appointment, consistent with monitoring definitions used by the National AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections Control Programme (NASHCoP). Pharmacy refill adherence was calculated longitudinally and categorized as good ([&ge;]85%) or poor (<85%). Regional and district-level patterns were visualized using geospatial mapping. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of LTFU. ResultsA total of 52,828 PLHIV were included in the study, representing all 26 mainland regions of Tanzania. Overall, 26.6% were classified as LTFU during follow-up, with marked regional variation. The highest proportional LTFU was observed in Dar es Salaam (33.2%), followed by Njombe (32.9%) and Geita (32.7%), while the lowest was recorded in Mwanza (19.1%) and Iringa (20.3%). Good pharmacy refill adherence ([&ge;]85%) was strongly associated with lower odds of LTFU and remained the most robust independent predictor after adjustment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.35). District-level analyses revealed substantial within-region heterogeneity, identifying localized clusters of elevated attrition not apparent in regional aggregates. ConclusionLTFU remains a major challenge to sustaining effective ART delivery in Tanzania. Pharmacy refill adherence may serve as a practical early indicator for identifying individuals at risk of disengagement from HIV care. Integrating refill-based monitoring with spatially informed analysis may support targeted retention strategies within routine HIV treatment programs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.3%
2
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.3%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
8
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
9
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
10
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%